Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (1058880)	3/7/2018 9:16:07 AM
From: rdkflorida2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586861

Another IDIOT that does not know the difference between weather and climate. Soooooo FUNNY!! But also, Sooooooo SAD!

To: locogringo who wrote (1058880)	3/7/2018 10:24:40 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 1586861

"This one is global warming too, correct?" Strangely enuf, so was the snow I got over the weekend. BTW, as you can see, the NE is a bit warmer than normal today. I won't bore you by telling you that atmospheric water goes upm 7%/degree C. Teenagers Defeat Trump’s Move to Kill Climate Change Lawsuit By Kartikay Mehrotra March 7, 2018, 12:09 PM CST Government is accused of fostering fossil-fuel dependence U.S. argued to appeals panel case doesn’t belong in court A group of 21 youths who accuse the U.S. government of failing for decades to properly address climate change defeated the Trump administration’s attempt to keep the dispute out of court. The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled Wednesday that a novel and sweeping case, which the Obama administration first tried to extinguish in 2016, can proceed toward a trial. Trump’s Justice Departmentis expected to ask the Supreme Court to shut it down. The group of mostly teenagers in Oregon alleged in a 2015 complaint that government policies have exacerbated global warming in violation of their rights -- and those of future generations -- under the U.S. Constitution. They claim that for more than 50 years, the office of the president and eight federal agencies promoted regulations to support the U.S. energy industry’s proliferation of fossil fuels, accounting for a quarter of the world’s carbon emissions. They asked the court to force the government to formulate a formal plan to change course. The Trump administration argued the case is based on “utterly unprecedented legal theories” and that it’s unreasonable to delve into “unbounded” research into the executive branch dating back to the Lyndon Johnson presidency.