Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1059349)	3/9/2018 10:52:51 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 1571484

"you can recognize science porn when you see it. " Here's a good example. Message 31518955

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1059349)	3/9/2018 11:02:38 AM
From: FJB	4 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo longnshort RetiredNow Thomas A Watson Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571484

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1059349)	3/9/2018 11:27:26 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1571484

When I say, I believe in AGW, more specifically what I mean is that based on the reading I've done, the statistics I've seen, and the scientific consensus, there is a high probability that humans are causing an acceleration in negative climate impacts on the planet from the pollution we spew out. As I've said before, if we do something to make our planet cleaner and move to renewables, we lose nothing, but have a world to gain. If we do nothing, then either we have a world to lose if AGW is true, or if it is not true, at least we save millions of lives from lower asthma and cancer risks that come from pollution. So since you are an engineer, then you must know of Pascal's Wager on God, Heaven and Hell. We might as well believe, because the benefits of believing far outweigh the costs whether AGW is true or not.