Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1059875)

3/12/2018 10:50:38 AM

From: Wharf Rat

Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572003

" However, I do have doubts about certain things like how much of the variation is caused by the sun vs. human output of GHGs."
See

A Comprehensive Review of the Causes of Global Warming
skepticalscience.com

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1059875)

3/12/2018 11:37:11 AM

From: koan

Respond to of 1572003

I have those guys on ignore.

As I said, the scientists are easily able to quantify those issues you have doubts about, so in their mind there is no doubt.

<<

Well, like I said, I came to the same conclusion long ago that your son did. However, I do have doubts about certain things like how much of the variation is caused by the sun vs. human output of GHGs. That doesn't counter the AGW argument, but it is interesting to know nonetheless.

BTW, have you noticed watsonyouth and Thomas Watson's responses to my posts on my belief in AGW, based on the scientific consensus? His posts are positively hostile. When someone gets that emotional about something, I know that they are invested with religious zeal in an ideology, rather, than approaching things from a calm, rational and logical perspective. That's how I distinguish between the nut jobs and the people with something useful to say.