Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ronald P. Margraf Sr. who wrote (5725)	1/13/1998 12:17:00 AM
From: CIMA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116753

I respect your opinion but us Canucks up here have had a LIBERAL government for most of this past century and we're a long way from being communist. I've never understood how the right in the U.S. managed to link liberal with communist. In Canada, there is no linkage. The Communist Party of Canada, which exists as some obscure entity, has a totally different platform from the Liberals, who are pretty mainstream and swing slightly right or left of center depending on the political climate.

To: Ronald P. Margraf Sr. who wrote (5725)	1/13/1998 1:33:00 AM
From: Terry Swift	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116753

Ron: Most liberals think the Clinton tax increase is really the reason for the great economy the past 5 years. What nonsense. The economy is strong in spite of the the Clinton tax increase. GDP would be even greater without the drag of that increase. If tax increases lead to increased economic activty we could tax ourselves into prosperity. Ask George Bush what his $500 billion tax increase in 1990 did for the economy. A recession in 1991-92 and a new president in 1993. As for Slick. Don't get me started. He's way off topic here. This thread makes sense. Terry