SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications-News Only!!! (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blankmind who wrote (897)1/13/1998 8:41:00 AM
From: Gary Korn  Respond to of 1629
 
(COMTEX) WILLIAMS REINCARNATES CARRIER'S CARRIER BUSINESS WILLIAMS REINCARNATES CARRIER'S CARRIER BUSINESS Jan 12, 1998 (FIBER OPTICS NEWS, Vol. 18, No. 2) -- The Williams Companies' [WMB] launched its re-entry into the wholesale communications market Jan. 5, announcing some $1 billion worth of long-term customer agreements - including a nationwide, "anchor tenant" deal with U S West [USW] and a $260 million dollar deal with InterMedia Communications Inc. [ICIX]. Williams will offer capacity for half the cost of legacy players for comparable services, said Howard Janzen, president and chief executive officer of Williams' communications group. "We're building a network that operates at the lowest cost point." Williams also said it will upgrade its network with $150 million worth of ATM, frame relay, and network management equipment from Ascend Communications [ASND], as well as an acquisition of a 350-mile fiber cable linking Jacksonville and Miami, Fla. from MediaOne [UMG]. The announcements coincide with the expiration of a noncompete agreement with WorldCom [WCOM], which followed the $2.5 billion sale by Williams of most of its nationwide fiber optic network to the carrier in January 1995. Williams kept one fiber on the 11,000-mile network (currently the nation's 5th largest fiber network), and plans to expand it to 18,000 miles by the end of the year and ultimately 25,000 miles, spending some $1 billion Janzen said. Janzen says Williams can operate its network at lower cost points and out-price WorldCom because WorldCom is stuck with an antiquated legacy network, adding that selling the network to WorldCom allowed Williams to move forward with new technology on the fiber it kept. He also claims Williams has the edge on Qwest [QWST], because of superior technology decisions and more network in service today. Williams' technology choices fuel torrid debate over the best solution for the core network. ...Marketing Capacity "Williams has a different marketing strategy than we're seeing from any of the carriers out there," says Dataquest Chief Analyst Brett Azuma. Carriers such as Qwest, WorldCom, and the big three long distance carriers have a wholesale component to their retail business. The wholesale threat to the retail business of selling competitors capacity on the network creates an "internal battle full of angst," Azuma explains. Unburdened by angst, Williams intends to remain a carriers carrier, rather than offer retail services of its own. "It's our very core strategy," Janzen says. "We don't want to compete with our customers." "When people start offering to stuff money in their pockets," Azuma adds, it will be interesting to see whether Williams sticks to its guns. "They couldn't have picked a better time to re-enter the wholesale market," he concludes, citing rumors over the holidays that RBOCs may get into the long distance market in the foreseeable future. Speaking of data rates, Williams had a bundle of fibers running at 560 Mbps when it started out in the 1980s, points out Ryan Hankin Kent analyst Joe Savage. "With OC-192 and WDM, they'll have roughly equivalent capacity just on the fiber they have," he adds. "They'll be able to re-enter the marketplace quickly." ...The Network "We want to be a multiservice provider," says Gordon Martin, v.p. of sales and marketing for Williams Network. "With the configuration of Nortel optronics and Ascend core switches, there is no exclusivity [in protocol availability], and we're not blocked from next-generation upgrades." Although Williams recently signed up for $300 million worth of Nortel [NT] transmission equipment in September, the company went with Ascend for core switches. "We try to deploy the best technology available today for each piece of our network," Janzen explains. With acquired Cascade technology, Williams is convinced that Ascend offers the best core ATM switch available - although not necessarily the best edge switch, adds Martin, citing throughput, software, network management, and partitioning as key advantages. ...Big Switches Ascend will supply its GX 550 ATM core switches, which combine the scalability and capacity of a core switch with the intelligence, service capability, and cost-effectiveness of an edge switch, the company says. The core switch enables a multiservice, multi class network that handles different protocols with different degrees of reliability, explains Jeff Kiel, senior manager, product marketing for Ascend's core switch division. Along with other ATM and frame relay switches, the platforms will support more than two million connections, over 10 million cell buffers, and data rates from less than DS-0 to OC-48 (2.5 Gbps). Ascend has OC-192-capable ATM switches, Kiel says, but it is not shipping any product. Rounding out the network upgrade, Williams acquired fiber from MediaOne, which follows rights-of-way of the Florida East Coast Railway along the Atlantic coast. The segment enhances Williams' Southern build-out from Houston to Washington, D.C., via Atlanta. More construction is planned from Atlanta to Jacksonville. Williams will provide capacity back to MediaOne, and sell or exchange dark fiber, and lease capacity on the route. Addressing the fact that the Williams network is short on ring architecture, Martin says "SONET rings in your own network may not be the Holy Grail. You build a network to perform." For reliability, Martin says Williams will close up rings with future builds and exchanges with other carriers, as well as perform 1+1 linear restoration. ...Carriers Sign on for Backbone Capacity U S West is the first RBOC to sign up with Williams. The five- year deal is "a virtual acquisition of a dedicated nationwide backbone network," says Solomon Trujillo, U S West president and chief executive officer. "It's a key piece of the puzzle for both our data networking and inter-LATA voice business." The deal is an important step toward U S West's "data-centric" communications strategy and its impending entry into long-distance telecommunications, the company says. Trujillo lauds Williams' ability to build and operate a nationwide network, and says Williams' offer is very attractive in terms of other dedicated transport options. Trujillo did not disclose financial terms. ...Intermedia IRU Intermedia signed up for a 20-year indefeasible right of use of 2.5 Gbps on approximately 14,000 route miles of Williams planned network. The capacity will create 10 SONET rings in Intermedia's network. Intermedia plans to expand its ATM network from 22 major OC- 3 nodes to 35 OC-48 nodes by July. The Williams capacity enables Intermedia to dramatically improve bandwidth efficiencies and reliability, as well as reduce the cost of interexchange transport. The company expects the integrated voice and data services it delivers over the ATM network to be three to four times as cost-effective as those offered over circuit-switched networks. With Williams supplying a backbone fiber network, Intermedia gets access to high-capacity private line services, collocated equipment space at Williams facilities, and other carrier-level products. "We must devote considerable resources to managing relationships with a half dozen carriers," says David Ruberg, Intermedia chairman, president, and chief executive officer. "With this new agreement, we acquire the option to outsource our city-to- city network requirements to Williams and let them either provide us capacity directly or manage our overall network." ...Banging out Bandwidth The Williams activity "is another example that the world appetite for bandwidth is insatiable - and there's no end in sight," Ryan Hankin Kent's Savage concludes. (Jim Gipson, Williams, 918/588- 4740; Lucia Graziano, Ascend, 978/952-1291; Dave Banks, U S West, 303/896-3040; Tammy Snook, MediaOne, 904/619-3628; Chris Brown, Intermedia, 813/829-2408) Busting the Backbone With Williams [WMB] embracing an ATM and SONET strategy to handle multiple protocols on a national network, industry experts are weighing in on the fiber Jihad - a veritable holy war over the best strategy to carry IP, ATM, and SONET traffic on one network. Qwest [QWST], for instance, is working with Cisco [CSCO] and counting on Internet protocol (IP) equipment advances to usher in an all-IP network that carries all multimedia services. "The whole world is moving toward IP," says Nayel Shafei, Qwest's executive v.p., data products. Although he acknowledges that IP routers can't keep up with OC-192 SONET equipment, he predicts major advancements in routing rates this year. "The whole world has discovered that ATM is not for the backbone," Shafei says. He dismisses ATM as an attempt to resurrect circuit switching and characterizes major ATM deployments as "the last gasp of a dinosaur." "We believe there will be significant movement to IP traffic," says Gordon Martin, v.p. of sales and marketing for Williams Network. "But there is also voice, data, and video traffic that can run on high-end ATM." He concludes that "we would not articulate a pure IP or ATM strategy," but instead would enable both with the most efficient technology available. "For a backbone network, ATM is a pretty logical choice," says Dataquest Chief Analyst Brett Azuma. "It handles multiple media types at that scale relatively efficiently." Shying away from the "religious debate" over how to juggle IP, ATM, and SONET on a network, Azuma concludes that, "I think what Williams is doing plays more to the songbook that their clients have," citing RBOC preferences for ATM. "The revenue generating potential of ATM is better than double that of IP," claims Tom Nolle, president of consulting firm CIMI. Bucking astronomical IP traffic projections, he says that as margins on voice services fall, some 80 percent of carrier profit potential comes from IP applications, while IP traffic makes up 40 percent of network traffic. He sees Williams' use of ATM as a validation of ATM's ability to balance the revenue/traffic equation. Aggressively discounting the value of an IP backbone, he says that "the advantage that ATM has is really compelling," despite the fact that it was over-hyped in the early '90s. He cites ATM's ability to handle both legacy and new services as key advantages and questions IP's effectiveness at delivering voice and video. Although passed by on the ATM side by Williams, Nortel [NT] - which supplies both Qwest and Williams - is content with either IP or ATM strategy. "I think what's really clear is that you need a SONET network to underlie either one," says Greg Mumford, Nortel's general manager and v.p. for SONET networks. "We don't get religious on this," says Jeff Kiel, senior manager for product marketing for the core switch division at Ascend [ASND], a Cisco rival that also makes IP routers. "We will build products to meet our customers' needs." And customer needs may topple SONET's reign on the backbone. As customers drive ATM quality-of-service improvements, Williams' Martin makes clear that Williams Network will accommodate them - even if that means displacing SONET. A lot of people in the fiber space say high-capacity fiber eliminates the need for ATM," Nolle concludes. "The Williams buy convincingly demonstrates that glass is not enough." -0- Copyright Phillips Publishing, Inc.



To: blankmind who wrote (897)1/13/1998 8:50:00 AM
From: Gary Korn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1629
 
(COMTEX) Williams Plans to Beat Competition on Price Return of the Ba Williams Plans to Beat Competition on Price Return of the Backbone Player Boon for ISPs Jan 12, 1998 (INTERNET WEEK, Vol. 4, No. 2) -- Three years after the sale of its data transportation unit to WorldCom [WCOM], Williams Communications [WMB] re-entered the data transportation market as its non-competitive clause expired Jan. 5. It is determined to compete with WorldCom, Qwest Communications International Inc. [QWST], IXC Communications Inc. [IIXC] and Frontier Corp. [FRO] on price. "We can meet or beat any competition out there on the market," Frank Semple, president of Williams Network and vice president of Williams Communications, tells Internet Week. Tulsa, Okla.-based Williams' entry into the market for data transportation will allow for more flexibility on pricing of data services and new revenue potential for ISPs. "Finally ISPs will get a wholesale bandwidth supplier that won't try to compete with them," says Brett Azuma, an analyst with Dataquest. The market price for data transportation, which was at 6 to 7 cents per DS0 mile 18 months ago, is currently at 3 to 4 cents per DS0 mile. Industry insiders expect Williams' entry into the market to drive the price down to 1.5 to 2 cents per DS0 mile. The reason Williams is able to compete on the price is its positioning in the market. "Because of the way we do business and our real strong strategic partnerships, our benchmark costs for these network products are lower than those of the competition," says Semple. "We won't be undercutting the market, though." Williams, which is nation's largest transporter of the natural gas, has re-entered the market place as a "carriers' carrier," a wholesaler dedicated to the business of transportation and not interested in providing other kinds of data services like all other data transportation companies do. Williams started laying first fiber optic wires alongside with its pipelines in the mid-1980s. Three years ago it sold its data transportation unit, Wiltel, to WorldCom for $2.5 billion, retaining one strand of its fiber optic network. The deal, closed Jan. 5, 1995, included a three-year non-competitive close which excluded Williams from the data transportation business. The clause expired this year and Williams announced its reentry into the market. "We want to stay in the transportation business because that's where our company's strengths are," says Semple. To succeed, Williams wants to offer its customers best value for the price and establish a limited number of strategic partnerships. "Williams wants to be a high-end, high-volume technology company," says William Hyler, energy analyst with CIBC Oppenheimer. "Wait for more news from them and other regionals." One of the dangers analyst see in Williams' position is the demand for company's services, when large corporate clients will be enticed to turn straight to Willimas instead of purchasing backbone access from a telco or an ISP. "It's hard to resist when customers are knocking down the doors," says Azuma. The Network The value for the basic services the company sells, which are data transportation and co-location, is based largely on the available facilities. Williams has currently deployed 11,000 miles of the OC48 fiber optic cable expanded to OC192 capacity with wave multiplexing technology across the country. The company announced it will have the total of 18,000 miles of fiber optic cable deployed by the beginning of next year. The growth of the network will be done through construction and acquisition. "Our capital investment program from now to the year 2000 is $1 billion," Semple says. This investment plan rivals WorldCom's "$1 million a day" expansion program. Also, Williams is pursuing an aggressive acquisition strategy. For example, on Jan. 5 the company bought 350 miles of fiber linking Jacksonville and Miami for an undisclosed amount from MediaOne [UMG], newly independent division of U S West. Another source of network growth for Williams will be swaps of dark for light fiber the company plans to engineer in the regions of the country where its competitive position will allow for such transactions. "We will be selling and swapping the dark fiber we own," says Semple. " The fiber that we need for our customers we will light." Williams' expansion of its SONET-based ATM network will be a major boon for Ascend Communications Inc. [ASND], since its switches were chosen as the best fit for Williams' network. The company announced it will purchase $150 million worth of Ascend's GX 550 ATM "smart core" switches. Semple says after evaluating carrier class switching technology on the market the company chose Ascend's ATM switches for their technical characteristics. Among other network equipment vendors, Williams also has a strong relationship with Cisco [CSCO], since one of Williams' units involved in video transportation services actively buys equipment from that vendor. It also purchases equipment from Nortel [NT]. The customers that Williams is marketing this service to are RBOCs, CLECs and ISPs. The company expects to put a sizable amount of telephone traffic on its network, which will be surpassed as soon as late this year by rapidly increasing data traffic. Currently the company's network is capable of handling about 50 million simultaneous phone calls. Williams buili its network to handle data, voice and video traffic. Partnerships Williams has entered into strategic relationships with several companies utilizing its network. Intermedia Communications [IXIC] has signed a letter of intent with Williams to purchase $260 million worth of capacity over 20 years. "This gives us a right to buy at least the capacity we've agreed on," says Bob Rouse, VP of operations for Intermedia. "We see all these telephone calls and old traditional way to do telephony transitioning into Internet connectivity and net telephony," he says. Currently the fourth largest telephone traffic carrier after AT&T [T], WorldCom/MCI [MCIC] and Sprint [FON], Intermedia's goal is to be in the first ranks of the companies offering net telephony. Williams also invested $15 million for a 12-percent stake in Concentric Network [CNCX], a multimedia business-to-business ISP in Cupertino, Calif. In return, Concentric has access to Williams' fiber. The third significant partnership is with U S West, which agreed to purchase bandwidth from Williams five years. "We don't expect to have more than 10 strategic partnerships," Semple says. (Frank Semple, Lynne Butterworth, Williams, 918/588-3692, Robert Rouse, John Strickling, Intermedia, 813/829-2864, William Hyler, Oppenheimer, 212/667-7000, Brett Azuma, Dataquest, 408/468 8213) -0- Copyright Phillips Publishing, Inc. *** end of story ***