Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spank who wrote (43277)	1/13/1998 9:20:00 AM
From: Francis Muir	Respond to of 58324

First fine flush OT on Emptying the bath gives Coriolis forces a better chance of being a major factor; that and the fact that bath outlets are more likely to be radially symmetric. OT off With volumes still low, but Peregrine now forgotten, I would not be surprised to see IOM up a quarter to 12+. FIDO

To: Spank who wrote (43277)	1/13/1998 9:37:00 AM
From: Ben Antanaitis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

OT Spank, I don't think the flush takes long enough for the Coriolis acceleration to work its magic on the contents. The direction of the flush vortex is determined more by the geometry of the bowl. In fact, "the directed flow from the 'under-rim water jets' is an essential feature of the 'fecal particle removal and elimination subsystem'. It is part of the 'bowl surface cleaning and sewer gas blocking function', which is one of the parallel processes of the overall 'Manual Flush Cycle' mode of operation of the device."* Coriolis effect is best viewed by looking at a simple sink drain where the water is free from man made external influences. *From the upcoming bestseller "Women are from SeatDown, Men are from SeatUp". Ben A. ;-) I gotta get more sleep..............