SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (63474)3/30/2018 11:32:59 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356676
 
>> You are being insensitive to the gay community.

I am NOT insensitive to the gay community just because I point out the scientific fact and correct your misstatement. But obviously, insensitivity has nothing to at all with scientific findings. They are what they are.

>> Ask a gay person. That is what they believe.

Again, this has nothing to do with science. For the record, I have a gay niece who close and is married to another gay woman and the subject of "how they became gay" has never once come up, given I remember full well her preference for girls from her early 20s.

It doesn't matter. I'm not sure how you feel the need to judge gays based on "how they got to be gay." That's something from 50 years ago.

But we don't lie about science to accommodate feelings. Or the subject's beliefs not based in science.

>> People like you can't just accept them, support them and and celebrate their difference and leave them alone to live their life like they want, you feel a need to fuck with them.
You have never seen a post or any other evidence of me "not supporting gays". I do not like gays or heterosexuals who are in-your-face about it (I once attended a gay pride event and I believed it was over-the-top as an event where young children were present).

>> All that matters is that gays would be fine with their difference if people like you would quit fucking with them.and support them

I'm not fucking with gays. I'm simply trying to point out to you (who claims to be of all things a 'social scientist') that you are once again taking a position that inconsistent with science as we now know it. It seems you masquerade as a scientist but are, in fact, an ideologue.