Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (63499)	3/30/2018 1:19:55 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 358863

There was no science presented in that link at all. In effect, the only relevant material was this comment: "During the past 30 years, a strong body of evidence has emerged to suggest that sexual orientation is biological. During this same time period, not a single bit of scientific evidence suggests that sexual orientation is learned has appeared." Okay. Where is the science? Show it to us. Chirp. Do you feel this constitutes a scientific determination?

To: bentway who wrote (63499)	3/30/2018 1:22:29 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 358863

They just desperately want it to be a "choice" so they can continue to discriminate against gay men and women. It's a lot harder to justify that, if it's biological. But even if it were a choice, it's hard to understand the hate. I mean homosexuals tend to be better educated. They tend to earn more. usnews.com What's not to love? I mean, just because the people next door engage in buggery, doesn't mean you have to. My neighbor has nipple rings- I'm certainly not getting those, but if he wants to pierce his nipples, what do I care? Heck, one of my teaching assistants is a Trump Humper. Should I shun him? No- he gets the same spring break gifts as the other TA's- even though he's absent a lot more. Just because you don't like the way people live, doesn't mean you should meddle in their lives- unless their choices directly affect you- like smoking, which, when done in public, assaults non-smokers with smoke. Buggery doesn't assault non buggerers with anything- except maybe the idea that somewhere, someone is enjoying buggery- but that's the problem of the obsessed buggery thinker, not the buggerers. And, of course, I'm not suggesting hetero's can't enjoy a bit of buggery nor do I suggest that homosexuals don't have a varied slate of sexual options to choose from also.