Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (63513)	3/30/2018 1:58:10 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 356628

>> It's the hypothesis supported by most scientists in the field. Which you are not. I know little about genetics, I will agree. I have seen no indication your understanding of science generally approaches mine so if you want to have a pissing contest we can do that. But what I do know about science is that the number of people who support a hypothesis plus five bucks will buy you a cup of coffee. It just doesn't matter. As you know, science is not conducted by consensus. You prove it. You don't. The best evidence, studies of identical twins, continues to suggest some genetic component and some environmental component. That is not proof of either of these two hypotheses. Liberal scientists (you're a liberal, but not a scientist), we know, never let science get in their way of their politics. We see it all over the place.