SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: campe who wrote (1551)1/13/1998 12:03:00 PM
From: J.R.  Respond to of 6654
 
CVIA's credibility continues to increase. However, that does
not mean a whole lot since the share price continues to hit
rock bottom. With approximately 100 million shares to play with,
CVIA has about 3 million to acquire other companies. Based
on today's announcement, it does not appear as though WOTD
has any assets. I think they have a group of intelligent and
experienced professionals, but no tangible assets. If they
did, why didn't WOTD help finance this acquistion? From the
announcement, it looks as though this entire deal is being
funded through a Reg S offering. Now, is this deal between
WOTD and CVIA really a reverse merger, or is CVIA simply
changing its name and adding new members to the board? Aren't
reverse mergers supposed to bring TANGIBLE assets from a private
entity to a public shell? I hope I am wrong and this scenario
is much better than I am portraying. Any comments?



To: campe who wrote (1551)1/13/1998 12:09:00 PM
From: Milk  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 6654
 
GJC: I agree, Reg S is not the best way of raising capital. I think the reason it was used is because it wouldn't require as much paperwork and DD as in a case with US investors. So I guess the trade-off was either keep postponing the merger and try to get US investors to sign up, or use Reg. S and proceed with the merger. Hopefully we'll receive some comments from Jack Arnold on this development.
Milk