Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Techniclone (TCLN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EZLibra who wrote (1061)	1/13/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: shero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3702

Get real Davis. 175,000 is only slightly more than 1/2 of 1% of the stock outstanding. That's not only not enough to force down the price as you are suggesting but its an insubstantial amount, especially considering the companies price history during tax selling. What will be more interesting is what the short position will be this month. Additionally I never said the S-3--or Reg D people weren't shorting the stock before Jan., or any other time. What is asked was if one was going to force the price down why not make your best effort prior to Jan. 1 when tax selling is over? You haven't made a convincing case of your convictions. Why don't you present your best evidence here to be judged by the readers. If you have any info other than your suspicions I'd like to see it. As for the SEC I welcome an investigation of the trading activity. Mine, yours, and anyone elses. We are both guilty of the same thing. Bad timing on the buy side isn't a crime.