SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Big Bucks who wrote (14558)1/13/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
 
If Taiwan, Japan and Europe announce total of 10+ new fabs started
this year, but I don't see this happening short term


BB,

With all of the data we currently have, do you see AMAT meeting their guidance of $2.08-$2.15 for this year? Mgt is still sticking to their forecasts. If we are to hear a warning regarding Q198, it should come in the next 2 weeks.

Regards,

Brian



To: Big Bucks who wrote (14558)1/13/1998 12:26:00 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Re: If this happens
then NVLS and LRCX would have to merge to compete and smaller
niche players would be aquired for their technology/patents,
Such as AGAI, and MTSN there are others that may need to merge
to survive this year.


BB,

You really think a merger is necessary for LRCX and NVLS to survive? They each have some pretty impressive technology to challenge AMAT but I am not certain a merger would help their cause. Although this idea is frequently bantered about it is my own opinion that if we were to have seen a merger, it would have happened by now. We have already begun the recovery and spending development of 300mm equipment has begun in earnest. Wouldn't this be a large reason to merge? At this point, any cost benefits would be mitigated to a large degree since each has their own 300mm program already in full swing. I just don't see a merger having much effect right now. Would appreciate any counterpoints you can offer.

Regards,

Brian