Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lawrence Brierley who wrote (8044)	1/13/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Lawrence, <<very subjective and there is a degree of bitterness in your posts>> Probably true. So have been my posts on GPGI, CHIP, IPM, and comments on resent press releases of MXAM. I have been watching these stocks long enough to appreciate that most are just a game of paper. One can choose to invest in what others will do irrespective of intrinsic value or future value and make money. Is that honest? I have done that in the past and find it sickening. Does that make for bitter posts? Maybe. Subjective posts can have value as any objective post because they bring perception and inference to the discussion. One can judge the consistency of accuracy and experience to determine value. Love feasts are guaranteed to lose most participants their money. I could ramble on objectively why a dirt is or is not properly valued, but it wouldn't make one bit of difference. Facts are bent and twisted to suit the agenda. Longs don't want to hear anything negative, so what's the point. Long's should have a lot more interest in patterns, objectivity and fact than me. I'll leave that to them.