SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (66022)4/10/2018 7:12:32 PM
From: Mannie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 365523
 
There is no client-attorney privilege if the investigators believe the client and attorney were involved in a crime together.

This raid was approved at very high levels, they had to have very compelling arguments.



To: i-node who wrote (66022)4/10/2018 7:47:54 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 365523
 
You realize that attorney-client privilege isn't absolute? That to get the warrant, they had to show evidence to the judge granting the warrant of crime being committed by Cohen, perhaps assisting Trump? That it's a much higher bar than your standard warrant issue?



To: i-node who wrote (66022)4/10/2018 8:08:58 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 365523
 
There is no attorney client privilege if a crime has been committed.

And you can bet they had to have proof of that to get that action from feds and OK from the judge.

You need to check your right wing clap trap before you post it.

<<

I think it is an outrage. Attorney-client privilege has apparently now been deprecated by the courts.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News