Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (66554)	4/13/2018 11:36:52 AM
From: zzpat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359091

Now it very well may be that economic opportunity for the working class is zero sum, that economic opportunity can only be expanded for some groups at the expense of the others. It's also possible that women, blacks and kids entering the workforce gave companies access to cheap labor which forced wages down. At some point, the economic gains from all that cheap labor dissipated. Slavery was about "free labor" more than anything else. The north didn't think the south should have access to free labor when they had to pay for it. Most of our economic and social divides are about cheap labor. How can a business get more of it? Does it go to China and then Vietnam after Chinese workers ask for more money? Of course, it does. But blame immigrants. It's easier to explain.