Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Zentek Ltd. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Antlizzie who wrote (15693)	4/13/2018 9:27:36 PM
From: rennie69	8 Recommendations Recommended By Cinema Show Glorieux gunzo jafo98 Mister D and 3 more members Respond to of 54314

Antlizzie is right slinging insults and bullying is counter productive and does not follow the intent of this board. Whether you are for or against the removal of the current Zenyatta Directors your posts are welcomed here equally. What is not welcomed is the sort of bullying that is starting to occur. Tone it down, be constructive or take the posts to another site. Thank you Lizzie for that reminder.

To: Antlizzie who wrote (15693)	4/14/2018 11:31:01 AM
From: rennie69	7 Recommendations Recommended By Ace/Ten Canseco emperor Mister D Mona3 and 2 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54314

"My other concern is time to market for graphene. Until product is in demand on an assembly line, we have no sales to speak of." Antlizzie from what we read with the concrete, paint and LIB's there is a market out there, early stage yes (aside from LIB's where there is an established market). How about Ballard; they continue to sign contracts and build fuel cells, apparently our graphite is perfect for their application, why is there no arrangement to supply to them? The obstacles exist within the company. Obviously the met report is the biggest because you can't market graphene or even attempt to unless you've proven without-a-doubt you can economically process it and publicly AE hasn't proven that. The other problem we face and I've elaborated prior; we had drills on site and a permit to drill, AE knew he was going to need product and he refused to drill the 21 holes. This would have created a nice substantial inventory for ZEN - "if AE's graphite to graphene conversion ratios are accurate." We have universities and R&D facilities that can convert our graphite to graphene according to AE. Why has he not offered a deal to one or more of them? They process so much for us and they keep so much for themselves, or some arrangement that would allow ZEN to benefit from their labs without ZEN initially incurring lab cost? There are companies and research organizations out there spending billions on researching graphene, they need product for their research and are paying for it. Why are we not selling to them? In my opinion because AE had one plan and the plan was for a buyer to show up. If he had of done those things I just stated he'd have had a better chance of a buyer showing up. "Or" at the least ZEN could have self funded the completion of the MET report and PFS. If it can be produced there are deep pockets out there needing to buy it. PS... The pot industry has not been legalized yet but their shareprice reflects the potential once it is.