Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1065319)	4/14/2018 3:54:57 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578124

What's your question, BC? Why is the UN sending investigators? Because that's what they do. Should we have waited for the results of said investigation? I don't know. Let's say the investigation confirms that Assad is responsible. By then, how much time would have elapsed? What would be the response, and how effective would it be, especially given the amount of time Assad would have had to hunker down and prepare? None of these choices are very desirable. I'm more in favor of isolationism, but it's really hard to ignore the use of chemical weapons, whoever it may be that used them. Tenchusatsu