Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (1065421)	4/15/2018 2:02:50 PM
From: GPS Info	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577188

That was my point to Brumar. He's not hated, and he was an avid Cruz supporter as I am. He despises Trump. More people do not despise Trump. Then you jumped into the discussion and are not making much sense to me. I understood that you don't hate Brumar, and I have realized that he despises Trump. My original comments referred to your statement: The GOP hates what you have done to yourself. You stated that the GOP hates Brumar, or obliquely, what he's done to himself, but my point was that others in the GOP criticize Trump without generating hate for the criticizer. me: Limited bandwidth, mostly. you: I see. My 3 examples are limited bandwidth. Your 3 examples are not. How stupid of me! No, my examples where due to limited bandwidth. I wasn't trying to imply that yours were. Where did I say he was not a war hero? I know Trump doesn't believe that he's a war hero. Do you believe he is a war hero? Who cares and what difference does it make? [The dossier] was fabricated opposition research. I don't think McCain knew the full provenance of the dossier when he passed it to the FBI. I think it's important to know his motivation for passing it along, if you want to call him a DIMM. Where did I say that I fudge facts? => There are always 2 sides, both sides fudge the facts... Implicitly, if both sides fudge facts and you are on either side, then you fudge facts - assuming your statement is actually true.