Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (67158)	4/16/2018 6:13:27 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362064

It was essentially correct for Christs sake-lol. I had forgotten the two southerners. it was not a lie, for crying out loud. And except for one or two it was all conservatives, which shows what shit bags they were! You right wingers get caught up in the trees and have no idea what the forest looks like. I was talking about the forest. There was not one northern liberal who voted against it. How is that? If they were all, however few, southern liberals that had conflicting cultural and political issues to deal with. The fact you cannot see the two conflicted southerners who voted against it were conflicted which makes MY case, not yours! PS It is not silly at all. Look the south and how blood red it is. So red it is statistically significant to correlate southerner with conservatives. What is the ratio of southern liberals to conservatives?/ <, 1 - Your claiming that "southern" is exactly the same thing as "conservative" which is just silly. <, The specific issue was your claim that all the liberals voted for and all the votes against were all from conservatives. That claim is false.