Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (26448)	1/13/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: Patrick Koehler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

Larry, my computer may have lied to me. INTC was expecting .90 and reported .98. Still down from a year ago. At 4:30 eastern, INTC is up one point, trading at 78. Would expect this to raise the NAS tomorrow, but anything can happen. The reason I bought MU puts at the close, was: 1. Computer giving me a sell signal on INTC 2. Close to a sell signal for MU. 3. Possible correction to last 2 day run up on MU. 4. Looking for MU to move toward the 30 strike price for Friday. Patrick

To: TREND1 who wrote (26448)	1/13/1998 9:01:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

TO ALL-- first, hello earlie, larry, skeeter, william and everyone else. havent been in in a while and thought i would say hello. also, i need some help. what was the consensus estimate for MU Q2 97? i seem to remember that they beat, but the number someone recently threw at me was much lower than i remember. i am trying to show this person that wall st. does reward companies that beat estimates, even if they have to incorporate non-recurring gains. and by the way....why is MU above 30? SKEETER, damnit....get to work. MU should be heading into the teens by now. good luck to all, trey