SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Nanoviricides - The Other Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: drkaz who wrote (520)4/18/2018 10:21:50 AM
From: Its_lose_not_looseRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 1010
 
Ha! You had to add the qualifier "in the end" to make your argument valid. You can't admit that I spoke the truth and you spoke a modified version of the truth.

It's irrelevant only from your perspective. From your seat of power as a moderator, it's easy to dismiss revolution as bickering and whining.

Open your eyes, doctor, and look in the mirror. You may be horrified to see what's staring back at you.

You and he who holds you on a tight leash (Putz) will be exposed.



To: drkaz who wrote (520)4/18/2018 11:18:10 AM
From: arvitarRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 1010
 



To: drkaz who wrote (520)4/19/2018 2:55:56 PM
From: arvitarRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 1010
 
So the saps realize there are only two possible events in NNVC's future:

1) They raise insufficient amounts of cash on massively diluting terms, or

2) They run out of money in less than 10 months.

Either possibility means the share price will get slashed to within a fraction of its current 13yr-low price.

Yet, they baghold. In spite of the inevitable. Like deer stunned by oncoming headlights.

The thought of realizing their losses, even if they can buy back 10X the amount of shares in a few months with the same money, paralyzes them into bagholding inaction.

Only the ridiculous words of a geriatric con man about "100B markets" allows them to rationalize their wilful loss of money.