Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (68292)	4/24/2018 10:28:02 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 358784

Yeah, and oddly, the IPCC is quite reticent to state that is a conclusion that is well supported by the science. Which is why I'm knocking Tim. The IPCC if anything is substantially understating the effects of AGW. They will have egg on their face in a few decades, and then all the Libertarians who were belittling AGW will instead be bashing the IPCC and scientists for "not sounding the alarm".