SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1066887)4/25/2018 6:54:06 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579680
 
Zero Hedge was established in 2009. According to the Boston Business Journal, the website "publishes financial news and opinion, aggregated and original" from a number of writers "who purportedly hail from within the financial industry." [8] Posts on the website are signed "Tyler Durden," a character in the Chuck Palahniuk book and movie Fight Club. [8] [9]

In 2009, shortly after the blog was founded, news reports identified Daniel Ivandjiiski, a Bulgarian-born former hedge-fund analyst who was barred from the industry for insider tradingby FINRA in 2008, as the founder of the site, and reported that "Durden" was a pseudonym for Ivandjiiski. [9] [10] [11] [2]

One contributor, who spoke to New York magazine after an interview was arranged by Ivandjiiski, said that "up to 40" people were permitted to post under the "Durden" name. [9] The website is registered in Bulgaria at the same address as that of Strogo Sekretno, a site run by Ivandjiiski's father, Krassimir Ivandjiiski. [12] Zero Hedge is registered under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski. [13]

In April 2016, the authors writing as "Durden" on the website were reported by Bloomberg News to be Ivandjiiski, Tim Backshall (a credit derivatives strategist), and Colin Lokey. Lokey, the newest member revealed himself and the other two when he left the site in April 2016. Ivandjiiski confirmed that the three men "had been the only Tyler Durdens on the payroll" since Lokey joined the site in 2015. [2]

Finances[ edit]Lokey said he joined Zero Hedge for $6,000 a month and received an annual bonus of $50,000, earning more than $100,000 in 2015. [2]

According to Ivandjiiski, the blog generates revenue from online advertising. [2]

Readership, views, and stances[ edit]By September 2009, Zero Hedge had begun drawing more traffic than some established financial blogs. [11] In that year, Quantcast reported that the blog had received 333,000 unique visitors a month. [10] Under the name Tyler Durden, Ivandjiiski was interviewed on Bloomberg Radio [9] [14] and Zero Hedge was quoted in the Columbia Journalism Review. [15] Matt Taibbi cited Zero Hedge as having accurately assessed the level of corruption in the banking industry. [16] In 2009, journalist Joe Hagan wrote that Zero Hedge's founder was "a zealous believer in a sweeping conspiracy that casts the alumni of Goldman Sachs as a powerful cabal at the helm of U.S. policy." [9] Susanne Craig of the New York Times described Zero Hedge in 2011 as "a well-read and controversial financial blog." [17]

In December 2012, Bank of America, which had been criticized by the site in the past, blocked its employees' access to Zero Hedge from BOA servers. [8] The site was described by CNNMoney as offering a "deeply conspiratorial, anti-establishment and pessimistic view of the world." [4] Financial journalists Felix Salmon and Justin Fox have characterized the site as conspiratorial. [18] [10] Fox described Ivandjiiski as "a wonderfully persistent investigative reporter" and credited him for successfully turning high-frequency trading "into a big political issue," but also termed most of the writing on the website as "half-baked hooey," albeit with some "truth to be gleaned from it." [10] Tim Worstall described the site as a source of hysteria and occasionally misleading information. [19] Bloomberg Markets noted in 2016 that since its founding in the middle of the financial crisis, "Zero Hedge has grown from a blog to an Internet powerhouse. Often distrustful of the 'establishment' and almost always bearish, it's known for a pessimistic world view. Posts entitled 'Stocks Are In a Far More Precarious State Than Was Ever Truly Believed Possible' and 'America's Entitled (And Doomed) Upper Middle Class' are not uncommon." [2]

Former Zero Hedge writer Colin Lokey said that he was pressured to frame issues in a way he felt was "disingenuous," summarizing its political stances as "Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft." Zero Hedge founder Daniel Ivandjiiski, in response, said that Lokey could write "anything and everything he wanted directly without anyone writing over it." [20] On leaving, Lokey said: "I can't be a 24-hour cheerleader for Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump anymore. It's wrong. Period. I know it gets you views now, but it will kill your brand over the long run. This isn't a revolution. It's a joke." [2]

Economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman describes Zero Hedge as a scaremongering outlet that promotes fears of hyperinflation and an "obviously ridiculous" form of " monetary permahawkery." [21] Krugman notes that Bill McBride of Calculated Risk, an economics blog, has treated Zero Hedge with "appropriate contempt". [22]

Craig Pirrong, professor at the Bauer College of Business writes that "I have frequently written that Zero Hedge has the MO of a Soviet agitprop operation, that it reliably peddles Russian propaganda: my first post on this, almost exactly three years ago, noted the parallels between Zero Hedge and Russia Today." [6] [23] [7]

en.wikipedia.org



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1066887)4/25/2018 6:57:56 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579680
 
Is Zerohedge.com anti-American propaganda?

Mitchell Paulin, M.S. Nuclear Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell (2012)
Answered Mar 5

......................

This viewpoint can lend itself to an “anti-establishment” paradigm, and over time ZeroHedge began to take an approach more akin to today’s right-wing conspiracy theorists. This mirrors what happened to others like Alex Jones, who had a general, somewhat non-partisan approach to promoting paranoia and falsehoods but took a turn towards authoritarian rightism during the Obama years, when Obama became of the face of their hate. I wonder why?

In more recent years ZeroHedge began posting more and more paranoid, divisive, explicitly rightist material that mirrors the sort of material being injected into American political discourse by Russia to cause chaos and promote Putin-style nationalism and rejection of truth. It has become a parrot of Russian propaganda, and often posts forwarded material from RT, Russia’s official propaganda distributor, and other sources mirroring its views. So while it relays propaganda, is it in fact a propaganda outlet, or just disingenuous or gullible? That’s less certain, but let’s look.

........................

One name that is now known inside ZeroHedge is its founder Daniel Ivandjiisk. He is a Bulgarian immigrant who, while attempting to make his way in finance in the US, got busted for financial crimes, probably pushing him towards a view hostile towards American economics. It also appears that prior to immigrating, Ivandjiisk was a member of the security services in then-communist Bulgaria during its time as a satellite state of the USSR behind the Iron Curtain. It is possible he is personally connected to other veterans of communist bloc intelligence/security services, like Putin. The Prop Or Not article links to a number of investigations into ZeroHedge, one of which finds another name from inside, Colin Lokey.

Lokey stated that while well paid, he quit because he had a hard time churning out material that was explicitly instructed to be promoting the agendas of Putin and his allies like Bashar al-Asad using Russian government positions. ZeroHedge appears to be self-financed, so it’s likely not an operation of the Putin government, but it is acting intentionally as a relay point for Russian propaganda. This article from The Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensics Lab examines how a number of nominally independent outlets like ZeroHedge, Global Research and Veterans Today often act as proxies for Russian propaganda. I highly recommend DFRL for articles about how information spreads on the internet.

Pro-Kremlin Outlets Rally Around RT – DFRLab – Medium

It’s one of a number of sites that aren’t explicitly propaganda themselves, but are laundering points that help it get into wider circulation in political discourse in America.

Quora



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1066887)4/25/2018 7:03:28 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579680
 
.....................
Astrange, fascinating story broke last week, one that contains the darkness of the Trump campaign and that has, like the Trump campaign at times, the cadence of a joke. A thirty-two-year-old man named Colin Lokey confessed to Bloomberg that, until days earlier, he had been one of the unknown authors of Zero Hedge, a blog that combines analysis of the financial markets, emphasizing the essential corruption of Wall Street, with what CNNMoney once called “a deeply conspiratorial, anti-establishment and pessimistic view of the world.” Each post on Zero Hedge is written under the pseudonym Tyler Durden, Brad Pitt’s character from “Fight Club,” a workingman’s nihilist. Lokey revealed to Bloomberg last week that Durden was actually three men: two wealthy financial analysts, Daniel Ivandjiiski and Tim Backshall, and Lokey, a recent M.B.A. from East Tennessee State University—their hired hand.

By his own account, Lokey was writing as many as fifteen posts a day, among them most of the political pieces. The gig had a certain formula, he told Bloomberg: “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry= dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft.” For Zero Hedge, Syria was a special obsession, a sign of the essential strength of authoritarian regimes and the weakness of democracies. (“Putin Is Winning the Final Chess Match with Obama,” one Zero Hedge article claimed last fall.) The pace of the propaganda was too much for Lokey; last month, he checked himself into a hospital, believing he was on the verge of a panic attack. The populism seemed false to him. “Two guys who live a lifestyle you can only dream of are pretending to speak for you,” he wrote. The “unmasking” that Bloomberg promised in its headline was really two, one inside the other. Remove the Tyler Durden mask and there were Backshall and Ivandjiiski, two successful bankers pushing populism. Remove the mask again and there was Lokey, pretending to be them. “This isn’t a revolution,” Lokey wrote. “It’s a joke.”

..............

newyorker.com



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1066887)4/25/2018 7:10:04 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579680
 
US intel raised concerns that the Russians were preparing to target Russian émigrés in the US labeled by the Kremlin as traitors or enemies, law enforcement and intelligence officials said. #Skripal

Julia Davis? @JuliaDavisNews

Julia Davis Retweeted Julia Davis

Julia Davis @JuliaDavisNews
Some of the Russian spies expelled last month from the US were tracking Russian defectors and their families #Russia cnn.it

Julia Davis Retweeted Julia Davis

"In at least one instance, suspected Russian spies were believed to be casing someone who was part of a CIA program that provided new identities to protect resettled Russians, the officials said."



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1066887)4/25/2018 7:12:15 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579680
 
Just think ... if Putin starts sending over guys w/ polonium and nerve agent to kill defectors here, you and Trump and Ten and l&s and the rest of the Corrupted Cult can defend Putin .... "He denies it, where's your proof Russia killed that guy, blah blah blah. It's a Deep State lie."