Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Woas who wrote (8857)	1/13/1998 6:28:00 PM
From: bob	Respond to of 31646

messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com

To: Steve Woas who wrote (8857)	1/13/1998 6:41:00 PM
From: jan m.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

I picked up on that too. The only contracts I am aware of for y2k are Sun, and Bmys. I think the hacker got me, just got up and running this AM. Went tilt last Saturday afternoon while logged on to SI. Jan

To: Steve Woas who wrote (8857)	1/13/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: Karl Drobnic	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Steve: "additional" was an unfortunate choice of adjectives. I just went over the known contracts with Scott for a piece that I wrote for an investing digest. He used that exact list. I don't doubt that they have ongoing work with some of them, but I wouldn't read too much into "additional". Remember the Matsushita contract that some recently updated us on - it was announced at $3 mil. and grew to $6+ mil. Much of TPRO's base business grows from project to project in situations where they complete one job and are then the sole bidder for the follow on work. That's the bread and butter aspect of TPRO, and there is often "additional" work in the base business. But I wouldn't read it as "additional" to the BMY contract, which is "new" Y2K business.