SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zzpat who wrote (69124)4/30/2018 3:16:27 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 354103
 
With the quite wide definition now commonly used (the FBI says "four or more") for mass shooting or mass killing the US is far from the only country that has them regularly. Most all large, probably all medium, and many small countries have mass killings regularly.

Murder is a more important stat than mass killing and much more than "mass shooting" (again if your dead your dead). The vast majority of murders are in ones and two and threes. There is evidence that gun control is somewhere between a very slight negative to a very slight positive in terms of reducing murder. For mass killings their is a lot less evidence of anything (since they are much less common) but it would seem that if gun control was going to make a big difference at all it would have to be relatively draconian, and even then it wouldn't stop mass shootings let alone mass killings.