SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: abuelita who wrote (141123)5/2/2018 12:52:35 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217944
 
Experience is perceived differently in the mind of each person. Different people have very different ways of reacting to what they experience, from birth. Most are familiar with the Myer-Brigg or Keirsey temperament tests, the results of which are constant over your lifespan. Temperament is just one way of looking at personal attributes with don't change after birth regardless of your experiences.

I recall asking my Grandmother's cousin why my Grandmother was a certain way, and she said, "Marion has always been like that ever since she was a little girl and I don't know why." — We had my sister's 24 year old son staying with us a couple of weeks ago. He'd describe things about his Mom and I said the same thing, my sister acted and reacted exactly the same way when she was 2 years old and I was 4. People's basic temperament doesn't change. Children have very different reactions to the same home with the same parents and as adults their memories are often attached to very different feelings. One former child as an adult recalls a situation as traumatic while their sibling remembers it humorously.

Our ingrained genetic component is so strong you can use it to differentiate liberals from conservatives simply by monitoring physiological reactions to stress inducers. Conservatives are essentially psychologically-crippled and ill-adapted to deal with the world around them, particularly if that world around them is a city.

Having first used simple surveys to categorize test participant's political beliefs as liberal or conservative, Psychologists then asked the participants take timed online tests as a task. A few minutes into the testing a loud buzzer goes off behind their seat. The trial actually tested how much the unexpected loud buzzer interfered with their ability to concentrate on the continuing timed online tests. Those with liberal personalities were initially slowed by the loud noise but quickly recovered to their prior ability. The ability to concentrate was far more depressed by the loud buzzer among those with conservative views and personalities and the decline in their ability to concentrate was affected more than three times longer. Needless to say, the resulting cortisol levels were far higher in conservatives a few minutes after the buzzer sounded. Buzzer, terrorism, death, hack, murder, fear, run, hide, fight-back, buzzer. That's how they're wired to respond to experience.

Liberals remember hearing a buzzer while conservatives remember being frightened by a buzzer.

There's a very real reason conservatives tend to prefer to live in isolated quiet places, because the stress of noises and the activity of other humans is disabling for them rather than comforting or empowering. One of my Grandparents lived near a street where you'd hear cars driving by at night. My sister and I were lulled to sleep by the noise of the cars. The car noise would wake-up my little brother with nightmares - I'll let you guess which one of the three of us siblings is conservative. People don't change.

Published in 2006 by the Journal of Research in Personality, were astonishing. In analyzing their data, the Blocks found a clear set of childhood personality traits that accurately predicted conservatism in adulthood. For instance, at the ages of three and four, the “conservative” preschoolers had been described as “uncomfortable with uncertainty,” as “rigidifying when experiencing duress,” and as “relatively over-controlled.” The girls were “quiet, neat, compliant, fearful and tearful, [and hoped] for help from the adults around.”A longitudinal study from childhood by the Blocks pinpointed another set of childhood traits that were associated with people who became liberals in their mid-twenties. The “liberal” children were more “autonomous, expressive, energetic, and relatively under-controlled.” Liberal girls had higher levels of “self-assertiveness, talkativeness, curiosity, [and] openness in expressing negative feelings.”

The Blocks’ experiment suggested that the roots of our political orientations emerge as early as the fourth year of life. But it raised further, essential questions: Would children from different regions or socioeconomic backgrounds diverge into similar personality groups? And how much deeper are the origins of these crucial personality traits? - theatlantic.com - They cite this limerick by Gilbert:

I often think it’s comical
How nature always does contrive
That every boy and every gal
That’s born into this world alive
Is either a little Liberal
Or a little Conservative

W.S. Gilbert (of Gilbert & Sullivan fame)



To: abuelita who wrote (141123)5/2/2018 1:26:11 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217944
 
The left-right political spectrum is universal. It forms a natural, bell-shaped curve—like height, weight, and blood pressure - theatlantic.com

Figure 1 shows the correlations between the left-right orientations of twins raised together and apart. The black bars correspond to identical twins, and the gray bars to fraternal twins. The first two clusters show the twins raised together. Identical twins (who share 100 percent of their genes) had more similar political orientations than fraternal twins (who share only 50 percent of their genes, like normal siblings).



The third cluster shows the amazing finding of Bouchard’s survey: Identical twins reared apart had a strong correlation between their political orientations; but the scores of fraternal twins raised separately didn’t correlate significantly. These results suggest that genetics plays a decisive role in determining political attitudes. In other words, identical twins are more likely than fraternal twins to agree on divisive issues, precisely because they’re more closely related to one another.

Psychologist Robert McCrae, with the help of his colleagues from numerous countries, has collected measures of these Big Five dimensions from nearly 28,000 people from 36 distinct cultures around the world. The participants represented the Indo-European linguistic family, as well as the Uralic (Finland, Hungary, Estonia, etc.), Dravidian (South India), Altaic (Turkic, Mongolic, etc.), Malayo-Polynesian, Sino-Tibetan, and Bantu (Sub-Saharan Africa) ethno-linguistic groups.

Variation in these Big Five personality traits is greatest within cultures. This finding makes intuitive sense, since a given population has a bell-shaped distribution of left-right political orientation. Moreover, Big Five dimensions such as Openness and Conscientiousness also form bell-shaped curves within a population.

In addition to the large variation within cultures, however, McCrae together with his colleague Jüri Allik also discovered small variations in personality traits between groups.