SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 9:28:40 AM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Sedohr Nod
tonto

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
Not knowing the facts has never stopped you from expressing an opinion in the past. That is with the exception of knowing the answer doesn't serve your cause.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 9:41:05 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck8 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
GUNSNGOLD
isopatch
lorne
rayrohn

and 3 more members

  Respond to of 224724
 
I cannot answer hypothetical questions without knowing all the facts.




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 10:31:48 AM
From: tonto2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Sedohr Nod
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
None of us have the facts regarding the investigation yet you asked me your question...and of course I do not have the answer.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 1:54:25 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations

Recommended By
DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck
FJB
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
comrade...."I cannot answer hypothetical questions without knowing all the facts."...

Sure you can, just lie,make up sh#t like you always do, same as far ledt nutters do.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 1:54:55 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 
DNC officials tell Hillary they want their money back
'It would be the Christian thing to do'
Chelsea Schilling
wnd.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 4:27:14 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 
How Much Does Hillary Clinton Drink?

Amy Chozick probably knows, but she isn’t telling.


By KYLE SMITH
May 1, 2018 3:02 PM
nationalreview.com

When the author of a book on the Hillary Clinton campaigns admits to breaking down in tears as Clinton’s defeat registered, you have to read between the lines to guess just how flawed Clinton is. Unflattering details come up, but because they’re being delivered by a friendly source, they’re not dwelt upon at great length.

One intriguing aspect of Amy Chozick’s reporting in Chasing Hillary is that Chozick wrote a story for the New York Times that never ran that celebrated Clinton’s convivial spirit (or, if you like, her boozing). After Clinton’s certain victory, the Times was prepared to run a full slate of stories exploring various aspects of its darling. In contrast, reports Chozick, as Donald Trump’s victory became increasingly probable on Election Night, an editor in the newsroom was heard to shout, “We got nothing,” meaning no stories prepared for the eventuality of Trump’s victory.

Scrambling, the Times repurposed a story that was intended to describe “white patrons at a dive bar in a Pennsylvania steel town ‘crying in their beers’ after Trump lost,” in Chozick’s words. The paper churned it into a tale of Trump’s unexpected triumph. It was pulled together so hastily that it was sent out into the world with the wrong bylines: Michael Barbaro and Matt Flegenheimer wrote it, but it was credited to Patrick Healy and Jonathan Martin, according to Chozick.

Chozick’s unpublished color piece on Clinton’s drinking was meant to illustrate that Clinton was not the starchy, purse-lipped frump of popular perception but a freewheeling good-time gal. Why couldn’t the story have run during the campaign rather than after it? That seems obvious. The factual details were such that they might have made readers question the Times’s spin that Clinton’s drinking habits reflected well on her. The attentive reader will wonder whether Clinton has a drinking problem. Chozick says that Clinton would have been “the booziest president since FDR” and “enjoys a cocktail — or three — more than most previous presidents.” Chozick isn’t saying that Clinton has three cocktails but that she has three cocktails more than a man. So: five cocktails, then? Five cocktails for a woman is generally said to have the same effect as ten cocktails on a man. Would you want a man who regularly put away ten cocktails to be president?

But it is fair to ask whether the nation came close to electing a president who regularly drinks to excess, and it is fair to ask of the nation’s press corps how much information about Clinton’s drinking they withheld from the public. Given that, according to Chozick, virtually everyone embedded with the Clinton campaign was a woman who was excited about the prospect of her winning, it’s also fair to ask of the major media’s assignment editors whether the reporters they put on the Clinton beat were even close to being objective observers.Clinton’s career in elected office is obviously over, and Chozick no longer has any reason to worry about whether she is ingratiating herself enough with Clinton’s handlers to assure her continued access. Instead, she abruptly stops the anecdote here and moves on to such matters as what Jon Bon Jovi was wearing while hanging out on the Clinton campaign plane. It makes Chozick look protective of Clinton rather than dispassionate.

Another potentially intriguing story that Chozick alludes to but leaves hanging is the question of Chelsea Clinton, who has become an increasingly vocal public figure in the last year and a half and perhaps has her eye on political office. (She keeps saying she isn’t running and has no plans to run but pointedly refuses to rule out running for office in the future.) Chelsea, we learn, is not the adorable figure portrayed in the slicks. To be blunt, she is “a real pain in the ass,” according to people working on her mother’s campaign. But we shouldn’t blame her because she was “raised by wolves,” one Hillary aide said.

In keeping with the family tradition, Chelsea is upset about the specks of reporting about her that did make it into Chozick’s book. The younger Clinton enjoys telling interviewers that her famously frizzy hair suddenly went straight in her early twenties, but Chozick (who is also plagued by curls) implies that she knows this to be false: “I also happen to know her New York hairdresser — and a keratin job when I saw it.” This sounds like merely an educated guess on Chozick’s part, not an assertion of fact, but Chelsea seems to hope she can undermine Chozick’s book as a whole by casting doubt on this inconsequential aside.

Instead of elaborating, though, Chozick simply implies that she knows much more than she lets on. Keeping the most interesting stuff private isn’t what reporting is all about. During Mrs. Clinton’s Democratic National Convention speech, Chozick thought, “She looked resplendent . . . [and] made all the complicated feelings I had about her briefly fall away.” It seems unlikely that a reporter harboring such emotion would be quite so circumspect if it was the Trump family she was covering — especially if Ivanka Trump seemed to be mulling a political career. Now that her parents’ careers are over, it’s Chelsea’s turn to try to convince the world she isn’t habitually misleading. Good luck with that.
NOW WATCH: ‘Hillary Clinton Is Mad You Didn’t Vote for Her’



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 5:12:35 PM
From: FJB6 Recommendations

Recommended By
DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck
Investor Clouseau
locogringo
Oblivious
rayrohn

and 1 more member

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
WINNING!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 5:17:08 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 
DOJ sends 35 lawyers, 18 judges to border to stop illegal immigrant caravan

washingtontimes.com

Attorney General Jeff Sessions deployed dozens of new prosecutors and 18 more immigration judges down to the U.S.-Mexico border Wednesday to handle the illegal immigrant caravan and to try to head off another summer-time surge of border jumpers.

The additional lawyers should give the government capacity to file more criminal charges as a deterrent to illegal immigrants, and the added judges will help speed decisions on asylum claims like the ones the caravan participants say they’re making. ...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 5:21:51 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 
Genocide: Christian Population in Iraq Drops by 80% Since 2003

Breitbart ^
| March 30, 2016 | Thomas D. Williams

The Christian population in Iraq has been decimated, dropping from 1.4 million in 2003 to just 275,000, according to a report released this month (2016).
The report, compiled by the Knights of Columbus/IDC, tells a horrific story of religious/ethnic purge in the Middle East that has produced the systematic eradication of Christians... Christianity’s roots in Iraq date to the first century and has fallen prey to Islamist militants committed to their extermination. The Chaldean Archbishop of Erbil testified for many centuries Christians of Iraq experienced hardships and persecutions “but what we have now experienced are the worst acts of genocide...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 5:37:50 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 
Inspector General Investigating Whether Strzok-Page Texts May Have Been Deleted – Gaps in Record Flagged
May 2, 2018, 3:40 pm by Cristina Laila



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/2/2018 6:47:43 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck

  Respond to of 224724
 
The diseased streets of San Francisco spread to rest of California

California highway maintenance workers facing health and safety hazards while cleaning up homeless encampments.

Posted by Leslie Eastman
Wednesday, May 2, 2018 at 3:00pm
legalinsurrection.com



We recently took a look at the diseased streets of San Francisco, after local reporters revealed a dangerous mix of drug needles, garbage, and feces spread throughout the city’s downtown area.

Now, as the number of homeless camps across the state skyrocket, union officials for highway maintenance workers are demanding health and safety protections for state employees who are exposed to the biological detritus while cleaning up roadside encampments.

In an official grievance filed last week, the union representing California’s maintenance workers accused the state of subjecting its members to hazardous conditions without proper training or equipment.

“It is the Union’s contention that Caltrans is not ensuring that our members are being provided the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), necessary training, necessary vaccinations and proper compensation for the dangerous hazmat duties they are performing when cleaning up homeless encampments on State Caltrans property,” International Union of Operating Engineers director Steve Crouch said in the complaint.

Crouch told KTVU on Monday that maintenance crews often have to work in areas where the ground is muddy, slippery and ridden with debris that can include objects that are exceedingly sharp. Other items are simply dangerous to touch, such as potentially toxic or biologically unsafe materials.

Workers who are potentially exposed to bloodborne pathogens (such as Hepatitis B or HIV) are required under both state and federal law to have vaccinations, training, and proper PPE. Therefore, the claims being made by state employees are very troubling.

One Caltrans worker, who asked not to be named for fear of retribution, said he has been involved in at least six cleanups so far this year.

“I’ve been exposed to blood, needles, women’s feminine products… five-gallon buckets of human feces,” he told The Bee.

His protective gear? A pair of gloves, he said.

“And that’s really not protective,” he quickly added. “It’s funky, and I’m putting this politely. It’s extremely nasty. You never know what you’re going to step in.”

If these allegations prove true, and the regulating agencies follow-up, the penalty could be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars that this state cannot afford to lose. For example, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) fines the United States Postal Service over $300,000 after inspectors find workers exposed to bloodborne pathogen hazards at a Maryland facility in 2016.

But bacterial infections and exposure to viruses isn’t the only hazard these highway workers face. Workplace violence is also a significant concern for those who clean homeless camps.

Sometime they have pit bulls in there, They’ll, you know, let the dogs loose to chase the Caltrans workers out. Sometimes they’ll throw rocks at the Caltrans workers,” said Crouch. Add to that: live electrical lines and even the occasional weapon.

..”Their job is to maintain the highways and freeways, you know, that’s filling the potholes, that’s doing the striping of the lines, that’s doing the guardrails alone the edge, that’s trimming the trees and shrubs and bushes along the highway. Their job is not to clean up homeless encampments,” said Crouch.

If Caltrans employees are expected to be hazmat employees, then they do need to be paid and trained as such. Otherwise, California is going to have to assign the tasks to another group of properly trained and protected employees.

The homeless may be living “cheaply”, but the expenses for the rest of us are exploding so that we can maintain at least the appearance of First World living. In its latest budget, Los Angeles alone has doubled the amount that it spends on addressing homeless issues ( projected to be $430 million), and most of the money to pay for these services is being borrowed.

No matter the outcome of the union grievance, it is certain that it will not address the root causes of the rapid expansion of the homeless population in California. I anticipate more money will be squandered, and public health issues will not be adequately addressed, for quite some time. Hopefully, however, our workers will be better protected and paid for obviously hazardous work.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/3/2018 8:09:40 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/3/2018 9:16:34 AM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
GUNSNGOLD
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/3/2018 9:42:25 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224724
 
DiGenova: Rosenstein Has ‘Disqualified
Himself From Continued Service’ At DOJ

Daily Caller, by Christian Datoc

Original Article

Joe diGenova told Tucker Carlson Wednesday night that Rod Rosenstein’s recent comments allegedly attacking Congress “disqualify” him from staying at the Department of Justice. “The deputy attorney general today disqualified himself from continued service in the Department of Justice,” the former U.S. attorney told The Daily Caller co-founder. “Jeff Sessions now has an absolute responsibility to call him into his office, berate him for saying that constitutional oversight is extortion.” “That statement by a constitutional officer like Rod Rosenstein is disgraceful, it’s an embarrassment to the department, but it is of a pattern of what Mr. Rosenstein has done there since ...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/3/2018 9:50:09 AM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Alan Smithee
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
BOOM! Black Male Support for President Trump DOUBLES IN ONE WEEK Thanks to Kanye West (VIDEO)
May 2, 2018, 10:55 pm by Jim Hoft

...
Before Kanye West announced his support for President Trump black male support for the president stood at 11 percent.

After Kanye’s endorsement black male support for Trump shot up to 22%.



This is devastating news. As Bill Whittle reported in his video today — if black support for Democrats drops to 85% the Democrat Party is in serious trouble. ...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/3/2018 12:37:18 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
tonto

  Respond to of 224724
 
Small Business Still Soaring


By James Freeman
May 3, 2018 11:21 a.m. ET

The forecast for political news may be stormy, but the owners of American small businesses are seeing blue skies in the economy as they continue to create jobs and increase wages. That’s according to the latest employment report from the National Federation of Independent Business, due out later today. The NFIB April survey finds that small firms are healthy, and that there are more of them.

According to NFIB Chief Economist William Dunkelberg, “The increase in new business establishments is running well ahead of eliminations, a real boost to new employment. Owners reported adding a net .28 workers per firm on average, the third highest reading since 2006 (down from .36 workers reported last month, the highest since 2006). Reported gains were higher only six times since 2000.”

The recurring story of recent months continued into April. While owners of small businesses are ramping up employment, they’re not hiring as many people as they’d like to hire because they simply can’t find the workers. Most of the 1,554 participants in the survey reported hiring or trying to hire in April, but a full 88% of those trying to add employees reported few or no qualified applicants for the positions they were aiming to fill.


Twenty-two percent of owners cited the difficulty of finding qualified workers as their single most important business problem, “exceeding the percentage citing taxes or regulations. Shortages of qualified workers are clearly holding back economic growth,” says Mr. Dunkelberg.


Firms in construction and manufacturing are having a particularly hard time finding potential employees. But, just like businesses in other industries, they are not giving up the search. A seasonally adjusted net 16% plan to create new jobs, down four points from March but “historically strong,” adds the NFIB chief economist. Labor markets for both skilled and unskilled workers remain tight.

This all suggests that tomorrow’s official government employment report will contain some good news. But it’s worth noting that last month the Labor Department found modest job creation in the broader economy compared to the vibrant small-business hiring tracked by NFIB. Mr. Dunkelberg nonetheless offers a Friday preview: “The unemployment rate will fall below four percent and the job creation numbers surprise on the upside (over 200,000) if owners have their way.”

Solid employment gains would no doubt please workers, too.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/3/2018 2:27:27 PM
From: FJB  Respond to of 224724
 
The Wall Street Journal Editorializes: Rod Rosenstein Protests:

His choice of the word “extorted” is illuminating. Mr. Rosenstein is right to say Justice and FBI aren’t obliged to “just open our doors to allow Congress to come and rummage through the files.”

But that isn’t happening here. In the cases at hand, Congress is acting through its committees as a separate and co-equal branch of government—the branch that funds Justice and has the right and obligation to exercise oversight. Congress is making specific requests regarding specific questions and documents.

As for the articles of impeachment, these too are expressions of Congress’s power. The practical worth of contempt and impeachment actions is less about removing an official from power than leverage to encourage cooperation. We had a demonstration of how this works in January, when Mr. Rosenstein and the new FBI director, Christopher Wray, tried to make an end run around the House Intelligence Committee’s subpoenas for information about the Steele dossier on Donald Trump. Only when Speaker Paul Ryan said Congress would hold them in contempt if they didn’t comply did they turn over the documents.

Mr. Rosenstein’s irritation might be warranted if the documents produced so far demonstrated that Congress’s demands were frivolous or imperiled national security. But remember how Justice warned the Intelligence Committee that making public its report on FISA warrants would be “extraordinarily reckless”? Instead, it provided the public with welcome (but still incomplete) insight about what went down in the 2016 election.

Or take the recently released memos written by then-FBI director James Comey to “memorialize” his private conversations with Donald Trump. We can see why Mr. Comey might not want it known that he assured Mr. Trump he didn’t leak or “do weasel things.” Now that everyone’s seen the memos, it’s clear nothing in them justifies the stonewalling before they were turned over to Congress. . . .

Justice can legitimately withhold information from Congress that might jeopardize specific criminal cases. But that doesn’t seem relevant here. We don’t want to see Mr. Rosenstein fired or impeached, but he and the FBI need to recognize Congress’s constitutional authority.

The Justice Department and FBI stink to high heaven, and Congress is justified in investigating them. (DAMN RIGHT!!!)

Posted at 1:03 pm by Glenn Reynolds

May 3, 2018
pjmedia.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/3/2018 6:18:09 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224724
 
TIME MAGAZINE ALERTS LIBTARDS TO COMEY JEOPARDY - ALERT!!!




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/4/2018 2:03:23 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
rayrohn

  Respond to of 224724
 


APRIL UNEMPLOYMENT 3.9%...

APPLE ALL-TIME HIGH...

TRUMP APPROVAL 51%...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/5/2018 12:17:28 AM
From: FJB  Respond to of 224724
 
PRESIDENT TRUMP TO HEAL AMERICA'S RACIAL DIVIDE - HE'S LIKE THE WHITE MLK!

REPORT: POTUS WANTS KAEPERNICK, KANYE FOR RACE SUMMIT

President Trump has reportedly agreed to invite NFL anthem-protesting quarterback Colin Kaepernick and hip-hop star Kanye West, to an upcoming summit on issues of race.“He is 100 percent for it,” said Darrell Scott, a Cleveland-based pastor advises the White House adviser on issues of religion. “He was very enthusiastic about it.”

Scott says he spoke with Trump about attendees for the summit in the Oval Office, after an outdoor White House ceremony for Thursday’s National Day of Prayer.

Trump’s decision to invite Kaepernick might come as a surprise to some given the president’s harsh criticism of the NFL anthem protest movement, which Kaepernick founded.

During the presidential campaign in 2016, Trump suggested that Kaepernick deal with his dislike for America by finding “a country that works better for him.” Later, as president, Trump said that players who followed Kaepernick’s example by protesting during the anthem, should be fired.

West, on the other hand, has been quite supportive of Trump. Calling the president his “brother,” and saying that the “mob” could not stop the love he has for him.

According to People:

While details of the meetings will be ironed out next week, it’s expected that there be a musicians’ summit followed by a gathering of athletes in the early summer—with both held at the White House, says Scott. The idea had been on the drawing board ‘for quite some time now’ and got a boost following last week’s Trump-West Twitter exchange, the pastor adds.

Scott expects Trump will be in attendance. ‘We don’t want to sanitize it. I want people from the left to attend. I want it to get heated but I want it to be respectful,’ says Scott.

Scott emphasized, “It’s not going to be a black-only event. It will be a melting pot.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/5/2018 9:20:11 AM
From: FJB  Respond to of 224724
 
HAPPY CINCO DE MAYO FROM AMERICA'S GREATEST PRESIDENT!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/5/2018 3:03:52 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck
rayrohn

  Respond to of 224724
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (209115)5/5/2018 4:49:23 PM
From: FJB  Respond to of 224724
 
Why the Justice Department Is Defiant

A House subpoena, another missed deadline. What is the department hiding?

By Kimberley A. Strassel
Updated May 4, 2018 4:42 p.m. ET
wsj.com

The feud that has simmered for months between Congress and the Justice Department erupted this week into a cage match. That’s because the House is homing in on the goods.

Until this week, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and fellow institutionalists at the department had fought Congress’s demands for information with the tools of banal bureaucracy—resist, delay, ignore, negotiate. But Mr. Rosenstein took things to a new level on Tuesday, accusing House Republicans of “threats,” extortion and wanting to “rummage” through department documents. A Wednesday New York Times story then dropped a new slur, claiming “Mr. Rosenstein and top FBI officials have come to suspect that some lawmakers were using their oversight authority to gain intelligence about [Special Counsel Bob Mueller’s ] investigation so that it could be shared with the White House.”

Mr. Rosenstein isn’t worried about rummaging. That’s a diversion from the department’s opposite concern: that it is being asked to comply with very specific—potentially very revealing—demands. Two House sources confirm for me that the Justice Department was recently delivered first a classified House Intelligence Committee letter and then a subpoena (which arrived Monday) demanding documents related to a new line of inquiry about the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Trump investigation. The deadline for complying with the subpoena was Thursday afternoon, and the Justice Department flouted it. As the White House is undoubtedly monitoring any new congressional demands for information, it is likely that President Trump’s tweet Wednesday ripping the department for not turning over documents was in part a reference to this latest demand.

The Justice Department rejected the latest subpoena request in a letter delivered to the Intelligence Committee after our Thursday deadline. The letter divulged that the committee had been asking for information about a “specific individual,” and stated it would not be complying on grounds that to do so risked “potential loss of human lives, damage to relationships with valued international partners, compromise of ongoing criminal investigations, and interference with intelligence activities.” The letter noted this decision had been made after consultation with the White House, though my reporting suggests the White House wants the Justice Department to find a way to comply.

Republicans also demand the FBI drop any objections to declassifying a section of the recently issued House Intelligence Committee report that deals with a briefing former FBI Director James Comey provided about former national security adviser Mike Flynn. House Republicans say Mr. Comey told them his own agents did not believe Mr. Flynn lied to them. On his book tour, Mr. Comey has said that isn’t true. Someone isn’t being honest. Is the FBI more interested in protecting the reputations of two former directors (the other being Mr. Mueller, who dragged Mr. Flynn into court on lying grounds) than in telling the public the truth?

It’s hard to have any faith in the necessity of the more than 300 redactions in the House Intel report, most of which the Republican committee members insist are bogus and should be removed. On every occasion that Justice or the FBI has claimed material must be withheld for the sake of national security or continuing investigations, it has later come out that the only thing at stake were those institutions’ reputations. Think the Comey memos, which showed the former director had little basis for claiming obstruction. Or Sen. Chuck Grassley’s criminal referral of dossier author Christopher Steele, the FBI’s so-called reliable source, whom we now know it had to fire for talking to the press and possibly lying.

The Justice Department is laying all this at the feet of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which technically oversees redactions. But ODNI consults with the agency that “owns” the material, and the FBI is clearly doing the blocking. Again, many pieces of the House Intel report that are being hidden happen to relate to FBI conduct during the 2016 election.

The increasingly poisonous interaction between Congress and the Justice Department also stems from a growing list of questions Republicans have about leading Justice Department officials’ roles in the events Congress seeks to investigate. Mr. Rosenstein’s name was on at least one of the applications for a warrant on Carter Page to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Dana Boente’s name is on another, and he’s now serving as the FBI’s general counsel.

We can’t know the precise motivations behind the Justice Department’s and FBI’s refusal to make key information public. But whether it is out of real concern over declassification or a desire to protect the institutions from embarrassment, the current leadership is about 20 steps behind this narrative. Mr. Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe —they have already shattered the FBI’s reputation and public trust. There is nothing to be gained from pretending this is business as usual, or attempting to stem continued fallout by hiding further details.

This week’s events—including more flat-out subpoena defiance—put a luminous spotlight on Speaker Paul Ryan. The credibility of the House’s oversight authority is at stake. Mr. Ryan’s committee chairmen have done remarkable work exposing FBI behavior, and they deserve backup. The quickest way to get Justice and FBI to comply with these legitimate requests is for Mr. Ryan to state strongly and publicly that he has zero qualms about proceeding down the road of contempt or impeachment if House demands are not met. This is the people’s government, not the Justice Department’s.

Editor’s note: This column has been updated with new information.