Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SteveG who wrote (8912)	1/13/1998 7:41:00 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21342

[ Chat ] Steve, If you would portray some .... different Human characteristics ... other than the ones you display now ..... [unexplicated] I may read your posts in entirety ..... someday. For now?? I'll stop at the 1st or 2nd sentence and let Mr. Mouse lead the way. Next!!! >>>====> The term I used was 'ignorant blowhard' >>>==> Thanks for explaining. We were just dying to understand. I sure wish you would stop reinforcing my opinion of you. Ray

To: SteveG who wrote (8912)	1/13/1998 8:45:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee	Respond to of 21342

steve- [chat--steves issues with reality] perfectly acceptable english is what is taught in school, which means proper words, not colloquilisms like blowhard. i really enjoy reading your posts in which you make it clear that you think you know what goes on in my head. steve, you arent god. its as simple as that. and you dont refute information...you pull things out of context and you dont do any effective research into the subject which you are pontificating on. case in point: my post on MU. i dont recall exactly what the EPS was supposed to be for the q297 EPS, but it was higher than the number you stated from their website. you conveintly skipped over the part about how after this release, the stock went up dramatically. the beat their estimates with the one time gain. and, as for trying to figure out their operations, you really have NO idea what you are talking about. there are many people on SI and on wall st. who are still trying to figure out how they get away with the inventory tricks. my 'spin control' as you so eloquently put it, is your perception. you simply jumped on me without asking for clarification of what i said. as for DES, the only thing propping it up is the government, specifically the clinton administration, including the FBI and the NSA. you really need to do more research into this. you see, this is another example of how you have 'corrected' me. you only corrected me in your mind.yes, there are still companies working on DES. there are also companies who still make buggy whips. another issue in the same vein that you chose to ignore was the loss in speed from having to decrypt/encrypt everything (as a supplement for your rather poor memory, we were discussing security issue surrounding cablemodems). even ultra fast chips are still going to cause a delay. of course that issue was conveiently dropped. what is your deal....first bill, then pat, and now me. just because i happened to question or make contradictory comments about something you said? thats just it, though. once you have your target locked, you refuse to allow the one between the crosshairs to attempt to clarify ANYTHING. pigboy got it right off the bat. you didnt. IMHO, he is without doubt a much better listener than you will ever be. unlike you, i dont have all the answers, and i can not stand those that pretend to. as for the remainder of your non sequitur, ad hominim attacks, i dismiss them with the same fiat you use so abundantly. it basically boils down to this...when someone has an opinion differing from yours, you attack. that is called antisocial behaviour. you need to see a psychiatrist. good luck to all, trey

To: SteveG who wrote (8912)	1/14/1998 5:37:00 AM
From: Pigboy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21342

SteveG, I disagree on some of your points, but most have nothing to do with WSTL. Many in your last message were mostly brought up by me, so i apologize for not wanting to talk about some things any more. << For one, since AFAIK, WSTL doesn't have any shipping DMT yet, WSTL's is CAP, while AWRE's is DMT. >> WSTL's G.Lite is CAP only? So, it exists, but it is only CAP? I assume that TI DSP's which will be software upgradeable and will be using the G.Lite standards that bill uraled (thanks), will make DMT G.Lite a matter of an upload? An example I am curious about-- I am wondering that IF some large RBOC were to throw in a large amount of WSTL DSLAMS in the Summer that depend on the TI DMT chipset WITHOUT G.Lite, well, will it be possible to keep that in place AND use any standard G.Lite modem in the near-by home with no problem? Does the DSLAM have to be upgraded? Will TI be able to upgrade the DSLAM to G.Lite with simple software uploads to possible older TI DMT chipsets? Will an ADI G.Lite modem in my home work with a TI DMT DSLAM well? Am I insane...I know what I am trying to ask, but I don't think I am being too clear... help?, pigboy