Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (69503)	5/2/2018 5:44:53 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 355705

Tim, you are completely nuts. I thought you were a CPA or something. You never heard of fund accounting? If A and B (two funds) have a borrower/lender relationship, you are trying to argue that the lender doesn't get "real interest" from the borrower, if the ownership of A and B is one thing vs another. Like I said, NUTS! BTW, non-arms length can in fact be me the same individual. If I own two corporations, two LLC's or just have two funds in my personal accounting it makes no difference. If one lends to the other than "real interest" is exchanged between the two. You seem fixated on the fact that A + B is a zero sum game. Sure, as always, between any A and any B, independent of ownership. What B pays in interest is what A gets in interest. So what???