SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (69528)5/2/2018 9:05:16 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356147
 
View image on Twitter





Constitution Sue@constitutionsue








To: TimF who wrote (69528)5/2/2018 9:16:04 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356147
 
<<<<<The government doesn't borrow money from the SS trust fund. Its part of the government.>>>>

You're more stubborn than a mule - and dead wrong.

The SS Trust fund is money taken out of your check for the single expressed purpose of providing retirement benefits - it doesn't go into the pool for building aircraft carriers. That is why it is a very distinct and separate tax. The government borrowed to fight those two fucking wars wars!!s - To build an aircraft carrier. To play stupid childish mind games to pretend that money is the same as any other government receipt is nothing more than an idelological fantasy land.



To: TimF who wrote (69528)5/2/2018 11:20:20 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356147
 
You are clueless about fund accounting:

The government doesn't borrow money from the SS trust fund. Its part of the government.



To: TimF who wrote (69528)5/2/2018 11:43:33 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 356147
 
A>> If the treasury wasn't itself in a deficit larger than the SS surplus almost all the time, then that might have to be the way to go

This is a much bigger consideration today than it was 70 years ago. Doesn’t seem like quite as good an idea today to put those dollars into Treasuries.