Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (69949)	5/4/2018 11:01:07 PM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Recommended By bentway Respond to of 359689

" Can you see how that might affect the legality of the search of Cohen’s office?" No. Did you hear the judge say "Maybe send it to the US Attorney, like Mueller did with Cohen"? Ellis’ comments, however, do not portend failure for Mueller’s prosecution of Manafort. For one, Mueller’s team has also brought money laundering and illegal-lobbying charges against Manafort in a D.C. federal court; while Manafort made similar arguments there about Mueller’s ostensible lack of authority, the D.C. judge seemed much more skeptical of his reasoning than Ellis did. Moreover, Ellis noted that his remarks did not indicate that the charges against Manafort were “illegitimate,” suggesting that perhaps they could be handled more appropriately by the local U.S. attorney’s office. slate.com

To: carranza2 who wrote (69949)	5/5/2018 12:30:10 AM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359689

It is amazing to me, Carranza, how many times you guys have taken a fact out of context and fabricated an entire conspiracy/story out of it which later turned out to be false and then you later just blithely ignore it and go on to yet another tale which, apparently, you also fervently believe. Don't you get tired of your stories constantly turning to be false? Or do you just forget them and go on to the next one? Or do you really believe that the "deep state" or the Clintons or Obama or whoever is so clever that they can continually successfully cover up those allegations that Drudge and Breitbart and the conservativetreehouse and all of those other conspiracy minded folks dream up? Do you believe that, aha, now they'll finally put Crooked Hillary behind bars in stripes where she belongs (assuming she survives that long, after all, she is supposed to be deathly ill as we were all assured during the campaign, it is a minor miracle that she has lasted this long!)? Or is all just a game that you play with yourselves because it is so amusing for some perverse reason and you have nothing better to do with your as you wait for ... who knows what? The next hurricane to hit P.R. or N.O.