Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (69954)	5/4/2018 11:18:46 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359647

Spaghetti at the wall, instead of giving us some examples where he doesn't care about the rule of law. "Because I researched that SOB." LMAO. You bigots are all alike. It doesn't matter whether the color is black, brown, yellow, or Republican red; you haters gotta hate. To quote Rat, "You sound just like the R's who said Obama didn't care about the rule of law."

To: koan who wrote (69954)

5/5/2018 12:18:37 AM

From: robert a belfer

Respond to of 359647

Because I researched that SOB. The right wing has been packing our courts with assholes for a long time.And they are doing it on steroids today backed by Koch money. Every single one of their supreme court nominees is unqualified to be there and working too empower the autocrats, like Citizens United, destroying the rule of law and our very humanity.

Finding exactly what I expected to find!

LOL. I am shocked, shocked I tell you.

To: koan who wrote (69954)	5/5/2018 12:29:40 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359647

>>Because I researched that SOB. You mean you read an article or two. I did, too, but still consider I know nothing about the man. Go read twenty or thirty of his decisions and the underlying legal reasoning. Then, you can say you “researched” him. What you researched was whatever feelings some reporter had about him.

To: koan who wrote (69954)	6/26/2018 7:35:54 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359647

"I researched that SOB" Look what your SOB just did. "Finding exactly what I expected to find!" Well, one of us did, anyway. Message 31603283 Manafort loses bid to dismiss Virginia charges WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort was dealt a major loss on Tuesday when a federal judge who had previously expressed some sympathy for Manafort refused to dismiss charges brought against him by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Judge T.S. Ellis in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that Mueller was properly appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in May 2017 and has the authority to prosecute Manafort. “Because the Special Counsel’s appointment was consistent with both Constitutional requirements regarding appointment of officers and statutory requirements governing the authority to conduct criminal litigation on behalf of the United States, the Special Counsel had legal authority to investigate and to prosecute this matter and dismissal of the superseding indictment is not warranted,” Ellis wrote in his opinion. A spokesman for Manafort declined to comment on the ruling. Tuesday’s decision by Ellis marks the second time now that a federal judge has upheld Mueller’s prosecutorial power – a pattern that could have wide-ranging and important implications as he continues his investigation into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia. Previously, Judge Amy Berman Jackson for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia also refused to dismiss charges against Manafort, after his lawyers sought to discredit Mueller’s probe by accusing Rosenstein of violating Justice Department rules governing the appointment of special counsels. Manafort is facing two indictments in Washington and nearby Alexandria, Virginia, arising from Mueller’s investigation into potential collusion between Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and Russia. His Virginia trial starts in July and his Washington trial is scheduled for September. Manafort has pleaded not guilty to charges including conspiring to launder money, bank and tax fraud and failing to register as a foreign agent for the pro-Russia Ukraine government. None of the charges relate to work he performed on the 2016 presidential campaign. Trump has denied that his campaign colluded with Russia, and called Mueller’s investigation a witch hunt. Ellis had previously expressed skepticism about whether Mueller had the power to bring charges against Manafort. At a hearing in May, he mused that Mueller should not have “unfettered power” and told prosecutors they were only pursuing Manafort so that he would turn over dirt on Trump. Trump later praised his comments and read them aloud to his audience during a speech at a meeting of the National Rifle Association. Ellis on Tuesday maintained that he still has strong concerns about the use of special counsels or prosecutors more generally. “The Constitution’s system of checks and balances, reflected to some extent in the regulations at issue, are designed to ensure that no single individual or branch of government has plenary or absolute power,” he wrote. “The appointment of special prosecutors has the potential to disrupt these checks and balances, and to inject a level of toxic partisanship into investigation of matters of public importance.” Manafort has been held in a jail in Virginia since the federal judge overseeing the Washington case revoked his bond on June 15, after prosecutors presented evidence during a court hearing about Manafort’s alleged efforts to influence witnesses’ testimony while he was under house arrest.