SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (70541)5/8/2018 1:43:44 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 364834
 
I don't know why they came back for the second traunch if the first hadn't been spent.

I don't either. I am just going by your links.

Also, per your links, the Hillary campaign was not the source of any of the money. Despite your claims.

As to your Washington Examiner link, when you go to the article it references, you run across this...

Ms. Bloom would not identify the donors. But two Democrats familiar with the arrangements said a nonprofit group founded by Mr. Brock, American Bridge 21st Century Foundation, gave $200,000, while the fashion entrepreneur Susie Tompkins Buell, a major donor to Mr. Brock’s suite of groups, gave $500,000 to Ms. Bloom’s firm for the last-ditch effort.

It was not productive. One woman requested $2 million, Ms. Bloom said, then decided not to come forward. Nor did any other women.

Ms. Bloom said she refunded most of the cash, keeping only “some funds to pay for our out-of-pocket expenses” accrued while working to vet and prepare cases. She said that she did not receive any legal fees for the work, and that she did not communicate with Mrs. Clinton or her campaign “on any of this.” She said she represented only clients whose stories she had corroborated, and disputed the premise that she offered money to coax clients to come forward.

“It doesn’t cost anything to publicly air allegations,” she said. “Security and relocation are expensive and were sorely needed in a case of this magnitude, in a country filled with so much anger, hate and violence.”

Like I said, your own links don't support your claims. That is what happens when you take the claims of talking heads and then skim the references for the information you want.



To: i-node who wrote (70541)5/8/2018 1:58:01 PM
From: zzpat  Respond to of 364834
 
The headline is not supported by the NY Times link. They're lying. It's not a simple mistake. It's a lie.