Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Nanoviricides - The Other Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: drkaz who wrote (634)	5/11/2018 1:44:45 PM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1010

The arrogant mind-numbing stoopidity of the dullard who calls herself Spaz MD'65: "My guess - we see Phase I Clinical trials for the anti-Shingles drug begin in Australia no earlier than April-May, and possibly not until Summer. If the Phase I goes smoothly, they should be able to get Phase II rolling during the Summer or Early Fall - assuming that they plan to do that in Australia as well and have their clinical 'ducks' all in a row. " MD'65, 11/2/2016 "I want to see 'something' go into TOX testing by sometime this Summer. My confidence will remain high until at least then,... afterwards I'll be wanting a few questions answered by the company as to what might be causing a delay. " MD'65, 3/13/2017 "I think a lot of pieces are moving - just out of sight of us and of the market. It would not shock me in the least to have some very positive bits of news start to come out over the next few weeks. In fact - I am starting to feel anticipatory for the first time this year." MD'65, 6/6/2017 "I would view that as a definite bit of positive news - if we were to get it before 2018 starts." [Spaz's response to someone asking what the chances were of selecting a lead and scheduling a pre-IND meeting with the FDA before the end of 2017] MD'65, 11/9/2017 "I'm still positive for the long-term, but the reality of our situation is in the near-term we're going to feel stress. The race between progress and the need to raise capital is a close one, and the longer this drags out, the harder it's going to be to recover." MD'65, 4/2/2018

To: drkaz who wrote (634)	5/11/2018 4:10:34 PM
From: Its_lose_not_loose	Respond to of 1010

Have anything to say now, dipsicle?

To: drkaz who wrote (634)	5/12/2018 8:03:38 AM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1010

"We got in on a badly structured deal. Why would anyone with money repeat our error when they are able to evaluate the down side (ineffectiveness) of that structure based on the historic track record?" Gee. Whenever I've said on IHUB that nobody will invest further money in this wreck for exactly this reason, SPAZ-MD'65 mocked and derided me in her typical arrogant and air-headed sniveling style.I wonder if she'll do the same here. Or, maybe since its one of the members in the Stuckholder Echo Chamber, she'll recommend it. She often does that to pretend in her brainless duplicitous and dishonest way, that she's "open minded".

To: drkaz who wrote (634)	5/14/2018 9:42:50 PM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1010

“Seems like w/o Seymour around, Diwan has his hands full. “ Please inform that painfully clueless sap that completing the financial filings for the SEC is Diwan’s wife’s job. That is what she gets the full time CFO salary for. Given that the company doesn’t have any financial activity other than cutting checks to Theracour each month, it’s absolutely astonishing how infrequently she manages to complete her one and only task in a timely manner.

To: drkaz who wrote (634)	5/16/2018 1:16:34 PM
From: arvitar	Respond to of 1010

All of the sniveling saps on the Blind Stuckholder board seem to fall into one or more of these three categories: 1) Moderately mentally retarded. 2) Insane (i.e. senile, delusional, psychotic). 3) Illiterate, or some type of cognitive disability that prevents them from being able to understand the written word, and unable to articulate their simplest concepts in writing. What's with that?

To: drkaz who wrote (634)	5/17/2018 2:07:04 PM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1010

What's with all the retardism and mental illness on the Paralyzed Stuckholder board? Is some type of mental handicap a prerequisite for Stuckholder status?

To: drkaz who wrote (634)	5/24/2018 2:46:58 PM
From: arvitar	Respond to of 1010

The medical community may still have full confidence in NNVC. Still?!?!?!?! Tell this Bat-Shit lunatic that the confidence the "medical community" has in a therapeutic is proportional to the strength of the evidence in a Phase-3, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study on human patients suffering from the real disease. Nobody but a sap cares about too-good-to-be-true claims by company founders and their cronies regarding benchtop preclinical "studies". Especially when those thousands of "remarkable" studies never lead anywhere after 13 years and $82M except to more such useless studies. That's why con men go to dumbo retail investors on the baby stock exchanges. They'd get laughed out of the room by professional VC investors.