Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BillyG who wrote (12564)	1/13/1998 11:22:00 PM
From: Paul Dieterich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

AMD Pushes Ahead With 'High-Risk' Move To 0.25 Micron By Mark Boslet Dow Jones Newswires -- January 13, 1998 SAN FRANCISCO (Dow Jones)--Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) posted a fourth-quarter loss smaller than what Wall Street expected and continued to push ahead in its high-stakes effort to wrest a share of the microprocessor market from Intel Corp. (INTC). The Sunnnyvale, Calif., chip maker lost 9 cents a share, significantly less than the 14-cents-a-share loss analysts had forecast. The company lost 15 cents a share in the year-ago fourth quarter. Advanced Micro Devices, or AMD, also shipped 1.5 million of its new generation K6 microprocessor, which represented a 50% increase from the third quarter, even if those shipments fell short of the 2 million the company hoped for at the start of the fourth quarter. The company's production yield - using 0.35 micron technology - at its Fab 25 in Austin, Texas., still isn't what AMD wants, Chief Executive W.J. Sanders III said on a conference call with analysts. But the company will push forward with its strategy to rapidly convert that production to more advanced 0.25 micron, which will produce faster chips, Sanders said. It is a "high-risk strategy" converting at such a quick pace, but one that is worth the risk, he said. AMD projected on the conference call that the majority of its production at Fab 25 would be at 0.25 micron by the end of the first quarter. But because of the technical challenge converting to the smaller circuit size, Sanders declined to estimate production volumes for the first quarter. He also said it would be difficult to project when volumes would be high enough to bring the company back to profitability. During the fourth quarter ended Dec. 27, AMD said it shipped its first microprocessors at 0.25 micron - 266 megahertz desktop and 233 megahertz laptop models. But the chips were produced at a Sunnyvale plant and not at the high-volume Fab 25. On the conference call, AMD went on to say that its plans to ship its K6 3D chip with 3D technology in the second quarter were on track. The product is code named Chompers. Efforts to construct a Dresden, Germany, chip plant to produce the next generation K7 chip also were on schedule, the company said. AMD plans capital spending of between $700 million and $750 million on the facility in 1998. K7 products are expected in 1999. In response to an analyst's question, AMD also said it has not sold a fully operational K6 chip below $75. Some followers of the company had speculated prices had dipped below the $75 level. For the quarter, AMD reported revenue of $613.2 million, up from $496.9 million a year ago. Sales of nonmicroprocessor products were down 2% during the quarter, but the product group was profitable.

To: BillyG who wrote (12564)	1/14/1998 2:40:00 AM
From: TI2, TechInvestorToo	Respond to of 25960

Do you really believe that AMD and cyrix have better .25 micron manufacturing capability (excluding big blue fabs which are probably arguably comparable) than INTC? What is Intel using for .25 micron manufacturing? Logic ( longevity and market share) suggest that SVGI and NINOY would be suppliers . CANNY seems to be a novelty for 300 mm (as UTEK was nearly 20 yrs ago, BTW HG UV bulbs offer benefit of broadband exposure relative to CYMI pure light, just like UTEK). Comments please Thanks TI2 PS Currently only invested in CYMI in litho. Looking for diversification. If filtering means SVGI, then IBM (and CYRIX?) were there first. You said: Supposedly Intel had been using mercury vapor UV bulbs and heavily filtering the light to get DUV. The light source is not as pure as CYMI's DUV lasers, so it will be difficult to get the fine patterning needed to go below .25 micron. And INTC will need to go below .25 to compete (at Intel's 58% margins) with AMD's and Cyrix's chips that are being manufactured with .25 micron technology. I don't know what Intel is currently using in its three fabs that are cranking out .25 micron Pentiums. Intel has been using a Canon DUV stepper, though... 207.183.153.206