Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microcap Kitchen Canadian Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Acton who wrote (48455)	5/17/2018 11:06:23 AM
From: Lessthaniv	Respond to of 49402

All my opinion of course, but illiquidity works both ways. It forces a longer term exit strategy but it also contributes to some opportunistic pricing on the downside. You just need to use this to your advantage. For me, illiquidity is a risk that is assessed at the time of purchase. It’s should be factored into an entry price such that the investor is compensated for accepting that additional risk. An investor buying 1m shares 5 years ago has had ample opportunity to liquidate that investment over their holding period. They most likely didn’t liquidate in one trade but rather in many over a longer period of time. If cash is needed sooner, it shouldn’t have been placed in an illiquid stock in the first place. Having said that .. the insiders here are all aging and they are faced with the same illiquidity problems as us. There is an argument to be made that the buissness is being prepped to be sold. We’ll see.