Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1069774)	5/17/2018 8:35:02 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578245

I'm sure they do.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1069774)	5/18/2018 8:31:01 AM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By majaman1978 Respond to of 1578245

It appears the bank should have records: The Bank Secrecy Act specifies that each firm must maintain records of its SARs for a period of five years from the date of filing. Not always: FROM: Leaker of Cohen docs left database audit trail, experts say... <snip> The official’s concern about disappearing bank records may have been overstated. Banks are required to keep all SARs for five years in their computers, according to Sanford Brown, a partner at Alston & Bird law firm and former bank regulator. According to people involved in SARs work, reports don’t vanish from the FinCEN database, either. Sometimes they are restricted, for example when the disclosure might compromise a criminal investigation, or when they involve a law enforcement employee who might himself be suspected of corruption or other wrongdoing. In the latter case, investigators would not want to let the person learn, by poring over his own suspicious activity reports, that he’s being watched.