Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (36554)	1/14/1998 1:01:00 AM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

Hey Rich, thanks dude....bad week! <lol> Pugs

To: Rich_1 who wrote (36554)	1/14/1998 1:02:00 AM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Rich_1, It may be too bad for you that you continually believe that the reason that nays posts on this thread is because "this must mean that the short squeeze is awfully close." As one "nay," I can tell you that I am not here because of the potential of a short squeeze but because I doubt that potential. I could be wrong, but nothing has told me that I am wrong. Other than Riley's posts, can you tell me that I am wrong?....with the kind of certainty that would cause you to invest YOUR MONEY? TC

To: Rich_1 who wrote (36554)	1/14/1998 5:58:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

<< Rich_1, and All It may be too bad for you that you continually believe that the reason that nays posts on this thread is because "this must mean that the short squeeze is awfully close." As one "nay," I can tell you that I am not here because of the potential of a short squeeze but because I doubt that potential. I could be wrong, but nothing has told me that I am wrong. Other than Riley's posts, can you tell me that I am wrong?....with the kind of certainty that would cause you to invest YOUR MONEY? TC>> this post needed repeating,and an answer needs to be presented by anyone who is in this for the squeeze play or believing it doesn't exist I believe you will find this is at the fundemental basis, as to why the nays are here. It's obvious the thread didn't progress, (at all) last night in any meaningful direction. I would like to see the day started out focusing on this question,not simply opinion but reasons for your opinion,that can be discussed. Mine,I see no verifiable basis for a short squeeze, I can't say it exists. My opinion, is based on the charts,vol, pricing history etc. I believe the TA(thanks TL),indicates there is no large short position in this stock. Obviously resulting in the conclussion that,then there can't be an illegal short postion. The vol. and price history, are the foundation for my opinion of a non-existent short position in this stock..This can be looked at,evaluated,and used to base an opinion.The chart/trading history are real verifiable facts, upon which, I can base my opinion....DD Please lets focus on this subject for awhile,stand up and say,this is my opinion and this is how I arrived at that opinion.-Lets keep the attacks down and discuss this..TIA