SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1070846)5/24/2018 6:22:27 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576742
 
Flynn has already admitted, under oath, that he lied.

Yep he lied about a NON-CRIMINAL act. WHOOPIE-DOO!!

The second question is why did Mueller charge Flynn only with lying? The last thing a prosecutor ever wants to do is to charge a key witness with lying.

A witness such as Flynn who has admitted he lied — whether or not to cover up a crime — is a tainted witness who is unlikely to be believed by jurors who know he’s made a deal to protect himself and his son. They will suspect that he is not only “singing for his supper” but that he may be “composing” as well — that is, telling the prosecutor what he wants to hear, even if it is exaggerated or flat-out false. A “bought” witness knows that the “better” his testimony, the sweeter the deal he will get. That’s why prosecutors postpone the sentencing until after the witness has testified, because experience has taught them that you can’t “buy” a witness; you can only “rent “ them for as long as you have the sword of Damocles hanging over them.

By Alan M. Dershowitz, opinion contributor — 12/02/17 03:50 PM EST



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1070846)5/24/2018 7:30:59 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 1576742
 
to stop the financial bleeding you ,moron why are libs so ignorant



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1070846)5/25/2018 8:16:02 AM
From: locogringo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576742
 
Flynn has already admitted, under oath, that he lied.

So if this type of legal maneuvering sits fine with you, then you had absolutely no problems with the impeachment of Clinton for lying under oath about that huge world shattering event that affected the national security and well being of the entire country?

That's quite surprising! Otherwise you would be a hypocritical partisan hack.