SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (27868)1/14/1998 2:23:00 AM
From: FJB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572274
 
Yousef,

Have to admit, you called it on the nose. Is AMD doing the correct thing by moving the process development team to Austin? How does a fab switch from one process technology to another logistically?

TIA for your thoughts,

Bob



To: Yousef who wrote (27868)1/14/1998 2:49:00 AM
From: greg nus  Respond to of 1572274
 
Yousef, I don't want to give you the wrong impression. SCD currently is working on a number of projects simotanoulsy. Advanced flash technogy,K7,.18u CU to name a few. SCD engineers know exactly what went wrong with k-6 and are now interactive with Austin personell watching like a hawk. It's confirmed now by the confrence call that FAB 25 is in a relainement. I personally know of one guy who left AMD. No indication if is was under deress. 0.25u transition is no 1 priority. So we will have to see if the squeekyest wheel gets the most oil works.



To: Yousef who wrote (27868)1/14/1998 3:13:00 AM
From: StockMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572274
 
Yousef,
Re -- This allow you to leverage the existing
.35um process (or .5um process ...) to establish a low defect density
baseline from which to make changes as you go to the next generation.

Doesn't this presuppose a low defect density baseline for the .35u process? However I agree, that moving development to the manufacturing site will lessen the problems.

With the K6-3D on .25u, AMD is throwing many more variables into the mix all at the same time.

Stockman