Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stuffbug who wrote (22255)	5/29/2018 12:30:40 AM
From: Shoto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Yes, the mine closure facility has to be included at the start. If something happens the government doesn't want to be stuck with the bill to clean it up and restore it like they have in the past with other mines. But don't get me started about the new Bill C69....It's going to kill all but the most ridiculously profitable mine startups, which will be located away from all water, air, soil, and where there has never been any people ever (no traditional hunting or fishing) and the new mine will have to clean the air and provide net benefits to everyone for countless generations to come before they can even start consultations. I doubt Canada will see any new mines for a long long time, if ever. That money will move south.