Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wildbiftek who wrote (146756)	6/1/2018 11:30:34 AM
From: DanD	1 Recommendation Recommended By Wildbiftek Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196761

It's all well and good to believe Apple is doing this for some noble cause but my main point is they've abided by those two contracts for quite some time to the tunes of hundreds of billions in profits without complaint. I think that is everyone's belief around here. Apple has hardly been injured. Right now, the question is not what is right, but what is legal and contractually agreed to. To everyone on this board, Apple's legal arguments seem to be nonsense, but their market power somehow gives them sway to get the case heard, and the unpredictability of legal outcomes gives them negotiating power. That's how I see it right now.