SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KERM'S KORNER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (8481)1/14/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING TUES., JANUARY 13, 1998 (2)

FEATURE STORY

Renaissance Enrgy To Win Back Investors' Hearts
The Financial Post

Contrarian investors looking for a value-priced oil stock should look no further than Renaissance Energy Ltd.

The Calgary-based firm is the envy of the oilpatch. Its consistent success during the past 15 years, where production and financial gains led to repeated splits, has made it the darling of investors and analysts.

Between 1987 and 1996, its compound growth rate for cash flow was 43%, earnings jumped 47% while oil and gas production climbed more than 30%.

However, the love affair soured in the second half of last year after president Clayton Woitas said in July the company would not meet its second quarter production targets.

In a market that rewards winners and scourges sinners, the judgment was swift and harsh.

From around $39 at the time of the news, Renaissance stock tumbled to end the year at $29.50.

While the Toronto Stock Exchange's oil and gas producers subindex fell 10.8% in 1997, Renaissance's equity took a 17.1% hit.

The stock (RES/TSE), which has a has a 52-week trading range of $50 to $24.25, has continued to slide in the new year. It closed yesterday up 15› at $26.

However, despite recent price weakness, the stock is still rated a a "buy" by a number of analysts who like its prospects.

Firms that recently issued "buy" ratings include Toronto Dominion Securities Ltd. and Petroleum Research Group, Inc. The latter, a New York-based research firm, has a target price of $30-$33 for Renaissance stock by the end of December.

Scott Inglis, of FirstEnergy Capital Corp., is looking for a yearend price of $38. He estimates Renaissance has a net asset value of $35 a share and is now trading at about six times cash flow, down from its historic range of 6 1/2 to nine times.

Renaissance's strengths include the largest land spread in Western Canada, a portfolio of gas contracts yielding attractive prices and a skilled staff experienced in drilling thousands of shallow wells cheaply and quickly.

It weaknesses encompass a large exposure to medium crude oil, less experience with deeper targets in Western Canada and no international plays.

The company's price-earnings ratio of 21.9 is close to peers, like Anderson Exploration Ltd. (18.1), Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (20.5), Crestar Energy Inc. (21.4), Poco Petroleums Ltd. (23.9) and
Talisman Energy Inc. (45.1).

However, Renaissance has a larger market capitalization than most of its rivals and a different asset mix from Talisman.

Apart from its stock price woes, the company has seen the departure of a number of employees, including some managers.

One of Renaissance's competitive strengths has been its ability to retain staff by rewarding workers with stock options. In the former ever increasing price environment, it was a strong incentive to stay with the firm.

However, the departures are raising some concern, says Gord Currie, an analyst with Canaccord Capital Corp.

"It shows there are some people who see more opportunity outside the company," he says.

Defenders of the Renaissance faith, and there are many in the investment community, say the firm is only experiencing normal turnover in an industry where experienced professionals are at a premium.

The make-up of senior management has not changed. These executives have not altered their key strategies - assembling large contiguous land blocks, owning properties entirely and maintaining operational control - that made it the blueprint for countless oilpatch imitators in the late 1980s and '90s.

Renaissance is now looking at making an acquisition, several industry sources say. While it has made large property purchases in the past, it has never taken over a public company. And with last week's savaging of oil stocks, now could be a good time for Renaissance to lose its virginity.

"I anticipate this is a buyers' market and I believe they are one of the best positioned by having abstained from the acquisition market in 1997," says FirstEnergy's Inglis.

The company has pursued a counter-cyclical acquisition strategy in the past.

A gas-oriented deal that gives Renaissance technical expertise as well as exposure to the high-risk, high-reward plays in the deeper part of the Western Canadian sedimentary basin would help revive the firm's fortune, Inglis says.

But Canaccord's Currie was less sanguine about the impact of a possible takeover. He says it would signal the company has abandoned one of its key strategies.

Without an international focus to raise the chance of making a huge discovery abroad, Renaissance may be able to keep growing its production by 15% annually, he says. That level of performance will help the stock recover, especially when higher commodity prices return, but it would not fuel a big run-up in price.

Renaissance is rated as a "hold" by Currie, who has a 12-month target price of $32 on the stock.

However, Peter Linder, of CIBC Wood Gundy Inc. in Calgary, this week downgraded the stock to "underperform" with a 12-month target price of $23.

He says reduced capital spending, smaller production growth and estimated yearend debt 2.2 times higher than cash flow were the basis for his lowered expectations.

A large Canadian mutual fund recently increased its holdings in Renaissance.

Trimark Financial Corp., through Trimark Investment Management Inc., late last month bought an additional 115,000 common shares of the company. The purchase gave it 17 million shares, or 14.7% of Renaissance's shares outstanding.

Trimark officials would not comment on the reason for increasing its stake.

Inglis says production growth this year from exploration efforts yet to be announced will give a boost to the stock's performance.

Currie also is not discounting the possibility of a renaissance in the fortunes of the stock.

"You still have the same senior management in place and I think that's a good thing," he says.

"They've been through the wars and prospered. If there's anyone that's going to make the company get up and go again, it's going to be that group."

For statistical tables, go here techstocks.com

FEATURE STORY

Chesapeake Delves Deeper Into Canada
The Financial Post

Chesapeake Energy Corp. increased its exposure in Canada yesterday with the announcement of its second investment in the past six months - and company officials say their shopping spree isn't over yet.

The U.S. firm said it has struck an alliance with Ranger Oil Ltd. of Calgary covering the Helmet area of northeastern British Columbia.

The large independent firm paid US$50 million for a 40% interest in Ranger's properties at Helmet, excluding the July Lake pool.

Chesapeake entered the Canadian energy scene last fall through a $20-million partnership with junior Pan East Petroleum Corp.

Tom Price Jr., vice-president of corporate development, said Chesapeake likes the long-term economics of Canadian natural gas.

"I wouldn't say we're through if we can find opportunities that make economic sense," Price said.

The move into Canada stemmed from a wish to get out of the high-production, high-decline wells from the Austin Chalk play in eastern Texas, said John S. Herold Inc. analyst Andrew Byrne.

He said disappointing drilling results last year helped push down the former high flyer's shares.

"They were looking to diversify away from the Austin Chalk and to get some long-lived reserves."

Ranger may have wanted the deal, Byrne said, because of heat from investors about its debt.

Price said the Oklahoma City-based firm has taken a gradual approach to become familiar with Canadian geology and operating practices. It eventually plans to operate its own wells rather than rely on partners.


FEATURE STORY

-Time Record Set In 1997 With Over 21,000 Licences

In what may well turn out to be an all-time peak for the Canadian petroleum industry, operators licensed over 21,000 new wells in 1997, setting records in Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia.

The frenetic pace pushed governments hard to keep up with operators who had cash to spend -- following two years of stronger oil and natural gas prices and pipeline expansions -- and targets to reach in order to keep investors happy.

The year-over-year growth alone -- 5,103 more licences were issued last year than in 1996 -- was about equal with the total annual licence count at the bottom of the current cycle in 1991 and 1992.

And despite a good start to the new year with over 97% of Canada's rig fleet at work last week, lower oil and natural gas prices will slow the pace in 1998.

In total, governments approved 21,115 new wells last year of which 26% were either directional or horizontal. Daily Oil Bulletin records show 3,452 of last year's new licences were for directional wells, up from 2,321 in 1996, while 2,107 new horizontal wells were approved for drilling, up from 1,461 in the previous year.

Deep drilling also continued to grow with 265 wells licensed to reach more than 3 050 metres. That compares to 182 in 1996 and 140 in 1995.

The busiest operators of 1997, measured by well licences approved, were: PanCanadian Petroleum Limited with 1,948 licences, including those of CS Resources Linited; Renaissance Energy Ltd. with 1,809; and Canadian Natural Resources Limited with its subsidiary Cannat Resources Inc. at 985.

Operators in Alberta had 15,420 permits to drill approved in 1997, up 29% from 1996, setting a record for the second year in a row. December was the busiest month with the Alberta Energy And Utilities Board approving 1,851 new licences. Prior to 1996, the peak year in Alberta was 1985, just before world oil prices crashed, when the former Energy Resources Conservation Board granted 8,759 new permits.

In Saskatchewan, the government authorized 4,646 new wells last year, up 38% from 1996. The previous record year was 1985 when 3,971 licences were approved. The Estevan region was the most popular last year with 1,447 licences, according to government records. Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. licensed the most wells in the province (658, including those of Wascana Energy Inc.) followed by Renaissance.
B.C. also set a record with 893 new licences, according to Daily Oil Bulletin records, thanks in part to a tremendous surge in the last quarter which included 239 in November alone. The previous record year was 1994 when 714 new wells were approved for drilling.

Manitoba activity also rose last year but not to record levels. The province authorized 129 new wells, up from 82 in 1996. Between 1982 and 1985, the province issued well over 200 licences a year.

A further 15 wells were approved for northern Canada in 1997 along with nine for eastern Canada, bringing the total Canada count to 21,115 for the year, a number that will stand out when historians look back at the fossil fuel age in Canada.



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (8481)1/15/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING WED., JANUARY 14, 1998 (1)

OIL AND GAS

NYMEX

Crude-oil futures ended little changed while petroleum-products finished mixed on the New York Mercantile Exchange Wednesday, despite a bullish decline in crude-oil inventory data and generally bearish products data.

February light sweet crude oil settled up $0.02 to $16.45.

Crude-oil stocks declined 3.179 million barrels, according to the American Petroleum Institute's inventory report released Tuesday evening. The U.S. Department of Energy reported Wednesday morning that crude oil stocks fell 1.1 million barrels. The reports cover the week ended Jan. 9.

The API showed a build in gasoline stocks of 5.686 million barrels, and the Department of Energy reported a gasoline build of 6 million barrels.

A 796,000-barrel build in U.S. distillate stocks, which include heating oil, was smaller than most players had expected and was mostly due to growing stocks of low sulfur diesel, according to the API, which allowed the heating oil market to discount it, said an analyst. Heating-oil stocks fell last week in the Northeast, the world's largest market for the product, according to the American Petroleum Institute, as demand in the region picked up.

Natural gas futures, boosted by cold weather and a firmer cash, ended higher Wednesday in moderate trade, then lost ground on ACCESS after slightly bearish weekly inventory data, sources said.

February rose 0.2 cent to close at $2.016 per million British thermal units, then slipped to $1.99 in after-hours trade following the storage report. At 1635 EST, the spot contract had rebounded to $2.04. March settled 0.8 cent higher at $2.02. Other months ended up by one-half to 1.8 cents.

"The AGA number was on the low side of expectations. We got an initial drop, but now we're running into some short covering," said one Midwest trader.

AGA said Wednesday that U.S. gas stocks fell last week by 50 bcf, below Reuter poll estimates in the 65-75 bcf range.

Overall stocks climbed to 67 bcf, or 3.5 percent, above year-ago. Eastern stocks fell 24 bcf and were 2.6 percent above last year. Consuming region west storage, which dropped 16 bcf last week, was 6.8 percent below 1997 levels. Inventories in the producing region dropped 10 bcf for the week but remained 12 percent over year-ago.

Forecasts this week call for some below-normal temperatures in the East, while cold Midwest weather is expected to warm to normal or above before cooling again Sunday. Texas is expected to range several degrees on either side of normal.

Chart traders said February's higher close today after yesterday's technical reversal to the upside could signal a short-term buy, particularly with the rebound on ACCESS tonight despite the bearish inventory report. But most needed a close above resistance at $2.085 to be convinced. Next resistance was seen at $2.25 and then at $2.34.

February support was pegged at the new contract low of $1.97, with spot continuation support seen at $1.85-1.88. Further support should be at prominent continuation chart lows of $1.77 and $1.68, the spot low last year.

In the cash Wednesday, Gulf Coast quotes were up slightly to the low-$2s. Midcon pipes also were modestly higher at about $2.00. New York city gate swing gas gained about a dime to the $2.50 level, while Chicago was up more than a nickel to about $2.10.

The NYMEX 12-month Henry Hub strip rose one cent to $2.167.

CANADA SPOT GAS

Canada Spot Gas Flat Despite Warmer Temperatures

Canadian spot natural gas prices were mostly unchanged on Wednesday despite warmer temperatures in the key Alberta producing region, traders said.

Spot gas at the AECO storage hub in Alberta was quoted at C$1.40/1.41 per gigajoule in thin trade, about even with Tuesday and down about three cents from last Wednesday.

Term business was also at about the same level, with February AECO quoted at C$1.38/1.39 per GJ, unchanged from yesterday.

''There are no spreads on anything, so you can't do any deals in the short term,'' a Calgary based marketer said.

Environment Canada said temperatures in southern Alberta were expected to moderate to highs of -5 to -14 Celsius (7 to 23 Fahrenheit) through Sunday, up from the -25 Celsius (-13 Fahrenheit) values experienced over the past two weeks.

The trader said he expected storage withdrawals would be cut back over the next few days, which would keep AECO prices stalled at about the same level.

At the borders, Sumas, Wash. spot gas was quoted anywere between US$1.85 and US$2.05 per million British thermal units, down about 20 cents from Tuesday and 15 cents from last week.

A marketer of British Columbia gas said milder temperatures on the west coast following this week's snow storm was cutting heating demand.

He also said Westcoast Energy Inc's (NYSE:WE - news; Toronto:W.TO - news) 700 million cubic feet a day McMahon gas plant in northeast B.C. was shut down for about five hours on Tuesday, which resulted in the cut of about 150 million cubic feet a day of supply. The plant was running again on Wednesday, he said.

Westcoast officials were not immediately available for comment.

Niagara spot gas was talked at US$2.15 per mmBtu, unchanged from Tuesday and down about a dime on the week.

WEEKLY ENERGY REPORT

Crude Oil Commentary and Trading Strategies

The market remains overwelmingly bearish. As we have recently witnessed, crude oil prices have been hammered as bearish concerns about both supply and demand have increased. Higher production from OPEC (with or without Iraq) and non-OPEC sources, coupled with lower demand growth due to winter weather conditions and the turmoil in Asia have been the primary factors behind the recent slide. But as importantly, the technical picture has been and continues to be bearish and adding to the downward momentum. We are of the view that prices should be gaining some support at around current levels, but would not rule out a move lower to the $16.00 level, before we see a rally of any significance.

NYMEX prices probably reflect most of the bearish news, however we do not yet know the full impact on the demand-supply balance from either the Asian crisis or the North American winter heating season. In addition, planned refinery maintenance in the United States will cut crude oil demand adding more pressure to the physical market.

Technically speaking, the charts (daily, weekly and monthly) all point to lower prices before any significant market rally materializes.

Natural Gas Commentary

The February natural gas contract is on track to move below $2.00, as pressure continues to build from recent record low temperatures across much of the United States. Weather conditions across the continent have outweighed the effect of larger-than- expected storage withdrawals. The storage levels are neutral to bullish news for gas, and while we remain bearish in the near term, we believe prices are well supported further out.

The technical outlook for NYMEX gas remains bearish in the near to medium term.

In spite of the recent cold snap in Western Canada (and believe me, coming from down South, this is cold), Aeco spot prices have faced strong resistance at C$1.50/Gj. The near term outlook for gas prices in Alberta is negative, with the outlook more positive in the longer term..

OIL & GAS PRICE REFERENCES

Charts: oilworld.com

NYMEX Reference quotewatch.com



To: Kerm Yerman who wrote (8481)1/15/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING WED., JANUARY 14, 1998 (2)

HEADLINE STORY
The Globe and Mail

The Oil Patch's Brutal Math

Everyone knows that what goes up has to come down, but does it have to come down so darn fast? Even seasoned oil patch watchers have been amazed by just how quickly things have gone from being exceptionally great to being absolutely rotten, thanks to a stunning freefall in the price of crude oil. As one industry player put it recently, the oil and gas sector has gone through almost an entire business cycle in only a year and a half. "We've gone from the penthouse to the outhouse," one oil patch chief executive officer told Reuters News Agency.

Last January, the price of West Texas intermediate crude was trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange at north of $26 (U.S.) a barrel, up from about the $20 range in the middle of 1996, and oil producers everywhere were awash in cash flow. That in turn drove stock prices higher, and helped fuel the unprecedented wave of takeovers and equity financings in the oil patch last year. Everyone knew that $26- or even $25-a-barrel oil couldn't last, but expectations of $20- or $21-a-barrel prices were fairly widespread. No one predicted a massive fall-off.

For one thing, the re-entry of Iraq into the world oil market as part of an "oil-for-food" deal, one of the factors that is being blamed for the recent price drop, had been under way for more than a year and was largely taken for granted (or so it seemed). By the middle of last year, another factor -- a 10-per-cent increase in production by OPEC -- was also pretty much a fait accompli. The only real wild card since the middle of last year has been the collapse of the Asian market, and the fear that has spawned about a corresponding slump in demand for crude oil.

After trading between $19 and $23 for the better part of the year, the oil price fell off a cliff in October. It has since bumped and tumbled down to a low of $16.30, lower than it has been since April of 1994, when it hit $16.26. In that year, however, just getting as high as $16 was cause for joy, since the price got as low as $13.88 in February. Things aren't that bad right now because many companies can still make money with $16.50 oil, but there is no question that high-cost producers and those with a lot of debt will find it harder to make ends meet.

The situation is made even more severe by the speed at which oil prices have plummeted. In most cases, when the oil price falls by such a huge margin -- more than 25 per cent in just the past few months -- the drop takes place over a longer period of time, and companies can adjust their drilling programs and spending requirements gradually. At the moment, however, many producers are committed to exploration programs laid out back when oil prices were a lot more attractive.

In addition, much of the industry is still dealing with the effects of higher costs for drilling rigs, land and services, costs that climbed steadily last year as high crude prices fuelled a frenzy of exploration and drilling. From the level of $6.50 (Canadian) a barrel in 1995, average "finding and development" costs for the industry soared to the $9-a-barrel range last year, according to a study by FirstEnergy Capital. The effect of those costs started hurting the profit margins of even senior producers such as Renaissance Energy last year, and that kind of harsh arithmetic isn't likely to get any better with oil prices dropping the way they have.

Even a small change in the price of crude can make a dramatic difference in cash flow. Gulf Canada says its operating cash flow rises or falls by $27-million for every $1 (U.S.) change in the price of oil, implying that it has fallen by about $175-million (Canadian) since October. Canadian Natural Resources says its cash flow increases or decreases by $17.6-million for every $1 (U.S.) change.

These kind of equations haven't been lost on investors, obviously. After steaming ahead for most of last year to a record high of more than 8,000 in October, the TSE oil and gas subindex has tumbled more than 2,300 points -- or close to 30 per cent. In fact, it has fallen more than 10 per cent just since January, and is now lower than it has been since the fall of 1996.

At this point, some analysts are saying the market has overcorrected, and that many companies look cheaper than they have in more than a year. Talisman Energy is down more than 35 per cent from October, while Canadian Natural Resources is down 40 per cent. Gulf Canada is off almost 42 per cent, perhaps in part because it carries more debt than other producers. Ranger Oil has fallen close to 44 per cent, and is cheaper than it has been since early 1996.

Although oil price forecasts must always be taken with a grain of salt, especially when they come on the heels of such an unexpected plunge, most analysts expect the crude price will stabilize somewhere around the $20 range this year. That means the selloff of oil stocks has almost certainly been overdone. Still not convinced? Then you'd be better off taking FirstEnergy's advice -- stick to companies with exposure to natural gas, which at the moment looks to have more upside.

FEATURE STORY

Canadian Oilpatch Ripe For Plucking
Report Says U.S. Energy Firms Seeking Acquisitions
Calgary Herald

Conditions are ripe for U.S. companies to make significant acquisitions in the Canadian oilpatch, according to a brokerage firm report obtained confidentially by the Calgary Herald.

The report highlights four factors making Canadian oil and gas companies more attractive to U.S. suitors:

- The Canadian dollar at 12 year lows.

- The relatively under-drilled Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin.

- Low share values.

- The upside presented by natural gas pipeline expansions to the U.S. that open beginning this November.

Authors of the report refused to comment, but some other analysts agreed with findings of the study.

"The trend is definitely in place. The industry will be a lot smaller at this time next year because of the consolidation, which will involve some U.S. players," says industry analyst Ken Faircloth of Goepel Shields & Partners, pointing to the acquisition last fall of Chauvco Resources by Pioneer Natural Resources.

Citing the loss in value of more than 12 per cent in the Toronto Stock Exchange's oil and gas index since the beginning of the year, Faircloth says companies may be more willing to consider merger or takeover opportunities.

"With higher debt to cash flow levels because of lower commodity prices, capital expenditure programs and production levels, some companies will find themselves in tough situations which they won't be able to get out of," says Faircloth.

" I wouldn't be surprised to see more of the types of joint ventures similar to the alliance announced yesterday by Chesapeake Energy and Ranger Oil to develop the Helmet area of northeast B.C.," says Doug Monaghan, analyst with Scotia Capital Markets in Calgary.

But Monaghan doesn't think that the lower valuations will pull in some bigger U.S. players.

"The bigger companies are more interested in the higher impact overseas plays," he said Wednesday.

"I am not seeing any evidence of increased interest by U.S. players in Canada," says Bob Hinckley of Merrill Lynch in New York.

Hinckley says most independent oil and gas companies prefer to stay in familiar territory, exploring and producing in the Gulf of Mexico and the U.S. Gulf coast.

"With currently available technology, companies can go back into old wells and go deeper or drill in previously untouched areas such as drill faults," he says. "Most companies look at Canada as a rather mature basin, especially on the oil side."

But statistics suggest otherwise.

The study shows drilling density in the U.S. basin is more than five times that of the Western Canadian basin, at four wells per square mile versus Canada's 0.7 wells.