Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JubilationT who wrote (23143)	6/10/2018 9:23:28 PM
From: N. Dixon	1 Recommendation Recommended By herewecome2001 Respond to of 50069

Even tho' I am very long in this stock and a loser at that, I have no sympathy for ND and her arrogance. For 20, 30, 40 years a proven losing proposition for investors and she comes up with that This was not a losing proposition when the stock went from $6 to $40 and all the way back down to $0.79. Investors cashed in on a short squeeze that lasted for years and shorts made money on a downtrend that went on for years. The question each investor must ask themselves is "why" and then invest accordingly. I invest in REFR because my grandfather started the auto glass business, which made a fortune. SPD is the newest and most predominant player in smart glass. Not just for autos but for several industries. That's why I'm still buying at these levels. I don't think Asahi Glass Company is a loser. I don't think Mercedes-Benz is a loser. I don't think Pilkington (who bought out my grandfather's company LOF). I don't think Vision-Systems is a loser. I don't think Panasonic is a loser. And what do all those aforementioned companies think about SPD. That's it's a phenomenal technology with several applications in several industries. And that's worth a whole lot more than $0.79. ND P.S. I know you're not really a long. And you do not play your "part" well. Try a more nuanced approached.