Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (1073632)	6/17/2018 12:12:37 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By longnshort Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570724

Anyone that has pride in the current policy of ripping kids from parents and detaining them is SICK. It's time for you to educate yourself you worthless brain dead moronic POS: *FLASHBACK: Obama Admin Kept Illegal Mexican Kids In Camps...* Until you do educate yourself, go fuck with somebody else. I detest stupid morons that think they know everything and know NOTHING but dopey talking points fed to them by their masters.

To: Land Shark who wrote (1073632)

6/17/2018 12:19:37 PM

From: locogringo

Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570724

PLEASE learn something today. You are so f'king annoying and such an embarrassment!

Government removal of children from
their parents didn’t start with Trump

American Thinker, by Elder George Original Article

The headline on the June 16th issue of a New York Daily News read Callous Soulless Craven Trump followed by the sub-headline "Prez´s edict led to 2,000 children stripped from parents in one week." The headline appealed to the emotions of the reader and the parental instinct of most people. Who would condone the separation of children from their parents? The American government, that´s who; it not only condones the removal of children from their parents - it fosters it. The government has routinely taken children from their parents for the past 50 years; not in increments of 2,000 as indicated in the tabloid, but by the millions.