To: teevee who wrote (259977 ) 6/18/2018 2:52:49 AM From: marcos Respond to of 313046 Oh well then - a word from any military man anywhere anytime is to be taken as gospel -g- ... maybe a few nuke torpedoes for a short while, or more likely test versions with carefully weighted dummy warheads and the scarey labels left on, because policy is to never state whether there are nukes present or not ... the great majority of delivery systems are by air, or space, ICBMs, cruise missiles etc ... torpedoes are for taking out nuclear-armed enemy subs mostly, nowadays ... it is just not logical that the US would store any amount of actual working nukes there for any period of time, they have better places for that ... what they don't have, is a test range area in their continental waters that provides that amount of space over that depth of inside water with that flat and smooth a bottom ... and btw, there are all sorts of non-torpedo stuff they test there as well Think that was wrong, where i typed the Nanoose base was 'leased to US' ... it is a canadian forces base with a long-term agreement to cooperate in underwater testing, there are extended periods of time when there are few if any US personnel on base, they move in when they have a programme on, just drive up from Puget Sound some of them ... i've had connections there too, one via security six or eight years ago, others via various acquaintances, had family who logged in the general area for decades, and i think one great-g-uncle who had something to do with it when it was Powder Point, maybe only knew people there or sold them something, don't know, that one's vague az.to - how about the south32 deal eh, instant two-loonie gain for holders ... wonder what they'll do with that cash, hmmm, cad1.8billion svb.to - same outfit made a deal with Silver Bull two weeks ago, implied value of Sierra Mojada at usd100m, with considerable room to grow, current market cap of svb/svbl is a fraction even of that - silverbullresources.com