Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Nanoviricides - The Other Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Its_lose_not_loose who wrote (841)	6/20/2018 11:06:40 AM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1010

Just looking at the Stuckholder Board now, it all seems a quite a bit weirder and more discomforting that it did initially. And far more so than any other scam I've tracked over the last decade. If anyone even hints at slightest whiff of willful dishonesty on the parts of Seymour or Diwan, everyone has an immediate and intense psychiatric breakdown. It's like watching the reaction of vampires after being exposed to light. Outside of that, anything else said, no matter how disparaging it might be about the company or founders, is acceptable. It might cause a bit of anger or irritation, but of a completely different nature. Like watching cult fanatics rationalize events with magical thinking and convoluted alternative realities to avoid the most obvious and simple explanations. A global conspiracy called the SHORT CABAL, manipulating the stock through illegal wash-trading that no broker would allow, sits fine with everyone. But any suggestion that the founders making tens of millions of dollars while never developing anything past the lab bench was a willful part of the plan, causes an immediate spastic frenzy. Really, really weird and creepy.