Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (1074142)	6/20/2018 1:51:41 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1579388

link?

To: Land Shark who wrote (1074142)	6/20/2018 1:55:09 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579388

Is the ACLU lying? aclu.org RILR v. Johnson Updated: July 31, 2015 The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered a preliminary injunction that puts an immediate halt to the government's policy of locking up mothers and children from Central America – all of whom have been found to have legitimate asylum claims – in order to send a message to other migrants that they should not come to the U.S. The case was brought on behalf of mothers and children who have fled extreme violence, death threats, rape, and persecution in Central America and come to the United States for safety. Each has been found by an immigration officer or judge to have a "credible fear" of persecution, meaning there is a "significant possibility" they will be granted asylum. Yet, instead of releasing these families as they await their asylum hearings, which the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has typically done, the agency now categorically detains and denies their release on bond or other conditions. The Obama administration adopted this policy — "an aggressive deterrence strategy" — following this summer's increase in mothers and children coming to the United States. The Obama administration's blanket no-release policy is a violation of federal immigration law and regulations, as well as the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibit the blanket detention of asylum seekers

To: Land Shark who wrote (1074142)	6/20/2018 1:58:24 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1579388

aclu.org Judge to Government: 'National Security' Isn't a 'Magic Word' That Allows Constitutional Rights Violations By Lindsay Nash, Skadden Fellow, Immigrants' Rights Project March 16, 2015 \| 11:15 AM blog-humantrafficing-500x280-v01.jpg For the past seven months, the Department of Homeland Security has been detaining and refusing to release immigrant mothers and children – even newborns – who have fled extreme violence and persecution in Central America to seek refuge in the United States. Why would the government implement such a heartless policy? *To send this message to other* people who may consider coming in the future: "You're not welcome."** But now, by court order, this policy must end. On February 20, in response to a class-action suit by the ACLU and others, a federal district court in D.C. ruled that it is illegal to detain asylum-seeking families to send a message to others and enjoined the government from doing so. The ACLU represents asylum-seeking families who have already been found by an immigration officer or judge to have a "credible fear" of persecution, meaning there is a "significant possibility" they will be granted asylum. Many have family members living in the United States who are willing to ensure that the families appear for scheduled court appearances.

To: Land Shark who wrote (1074142)	6/20/2018 4:23:21 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1579388

real or fake?