To: Alan Markoff who wrote (10727 ) 1/15/1998 1:10:00 AM From: Jane Hafker Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
Bob, I say in truth that the tone of that email was loving, and probably you wanted to discuss things without others jumping in. BUT. (There's always that word.....) BUT. Can you re-read Emiles every post to Alan, from post 1, and the posts prior to that which made Alan livid before he got here, as he was encouraged to come here by me because it was such a great and loving place and all good stuff, and all that...and then those posts, fired at him out of a cannon without a word of introduction, or what have you from Emile, just blasting hatred in stereo--Enile and Robert in concert, the rest of us kind of stunned. My question. WHich of Emile's posts to Alan were "of the Lord", as dictated by Him, and inspired by Him, for Emile to instruct Alan that Jesus could hardly stand him in his present condition--calling himself a Jew. That's all I ask. Do you truly see Jesus in those posts to Alan? Then you chastise Alan for saying that Emile's presentation was sick and twisted? That is a compliment compared to the hundreds of insults Emile hurled at Alan, including a very nasty little slur about Alan's name, like it was something evil...to Emile is was, because Emile is such a scholar that instantly he categorized the name Markoff as derivitive of Khazarian somehting hundreds of years ago. And you don't think that is a little sick? I do. And rude. That's a fact. I don't like rude and hostile lurkers who swoop in here with their CHristian-bashing, seemingly half-smashed aethiest personalities, and I sure don't like fellow Christians Jew-bashing a fellow believer. ANd mainly because Alan didn't like to be associated with Jim and Tammy Baker. Well, neither do I.l When we line that up viscious attack up with Jesus, Son of God, and lay the attack at His feet, surely something has gone wrong if you felt it was just fine. I just don't understand how you weren't offended as when one is attacked we all are attacked. And here is a quarter buy a clue. When jerks are throwing around Christ Killer and satan worshippers to people who are Jewish themselves, then the attack is purely upon them, as they are in fact being called CHrist Killers, so many insults I can't pick them all out to write here, and don't want to. It was sickening. Emile called Alan everything in the book except Ghetto strings of filthy cuss words. We were horrified, and embarrassed, and remain horrified and embarrassed. Now if you can't see anything of what I speak, and still feel like chastising Alan for refering to Emile's words as sick and twisted, compared to my Lord Jesus Christ, and what my Lord Jesus Christ would have said to Alan, they did in fact have a sick and twisted effect. However, Robert and Emile continue to congratulate each other upon a job well done. Hey.....I'm sorry to say it, but the jury is still out on that one. WHy don't we spend a month analyzing the attack on Alan, and lets find scriptures to back up the whole thing, with examples from the Lord or from the writers of the New Testament, and most certainly from Acts. Or John. Or James. Or anyone. Then let's analyze those scriptures with what happened before them and what happened after them and what circumstances compelled the speaker to speak them. If any of this comes lines up with what Alan is complaining about, and he is complaining mildly compared to how I would have blown up under similar circumstances, or let's say I was I Nancy's position--oh, boy, you'd have seen a show then. So why don't we analyze the attackers rather than the reaction of the attackees?