SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (1074691)6/22/2018 5:33:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580442
 
TopCat,
How is that not "zero tolerance?"
"Zero tolerance" isn't simply turning them back at the border or deporting them when they're caught.

Instead, it involves arresting them, throwing them in jail, putting them through an already jam packed court system, and going through the trouble of indicting and convicting them of a criminal offense.

It was meant to send a message, but in the process it got incredibly messy. Had we just turned them back at the border, we wouldn't be separating families or incarcerating them or anything like that. The kids wouldn't be our problem, since they'd remain with their parents outside of our borders.

Tenchusatsu



To: TopCat who wrote (1074691)6/24/2018 3:53:38 PM
From: i-node2 Recommendations

Recommended By
gamesmistress
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1580442
 
The interesting thing is that throughout this ordeal, the polling hasn't moved. On 538, it has moved a fractional point.

Sensible people understand that if you're going to do ANYTHING about the immigration problem hard choices will have to be made.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News